2016
DOI: 10.1111/jvs.12383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does succession run towards potential natural vegetation? An analysis across seres

Abstract: Questions: (1) Do 17 seres studied proceed towards corresponding potential natural vegetation;(2) what are the similarities between seral and potential natural vegetation, and is it possible to estimate how long it takes to reach potential natural vegetation; and (3) do primary and secondary seres differ?Location: Extracted peatlands, corridors of the former iron curtain, artificial fishpond islands and barriers, sedimentary basins, various spoil heaps after mining, various stone quarries, forest clearings, bu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During succession, synanthropic species continuously decreased, while species typical of scrub and woodland vegetation increased, which is quite typical of successions in human-altered temperate landscapes (Glenn-Lewin et al 1992, Walker & del Moral 2003. In the geographical area considered, succession usually proceeds towards potential natural vegetation, which in most cases is some kind of woodland, as documented by Prach et al (2016). In non-synanthropic heliophilous vegetation in open habitats, only species typical of dry grasslands increased while others decreased or did not exhibit any significant trend.…”
Section: Differences Between Groups Of Species In Their Ability To Comentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…During succession, synanthropic species continuously decreased, while species typical of scrub and woodland vegetation increased, which is quite typical of successions in human-altered temperate landscapes (Glenn-Lewin et al 1992, Walker & del Moral 2003. In the geographical area considered, succession usually proceeds towards potential natural vegetation, which in most cases is some kind of woodland, as documented by Prach et al (2016). In non-synanthropic heliophilous vegetation in open habitats, only species typical of dry grasslands increased while others decreased or did not exhibit any significant trend.…”
Section: Differences Between Groups Of Species In Their Ability To Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In non-synanthropic heliophilous vegetation in open habitats, only species typical of dry grasslands increased while others decreased or did not exhibit any significant trend. This can be explained by the fact that at very dry sites, woody species develop slowly or not at all, so succession may eventually lead to vegetation resembling steppes (Prach et al 2016). The decrease in heliophilous wetland species can be explained by gradual silting of some wet depressions due to sedimentary processes, especially at mining sites, and by increasing transpiration and shading accompanying the development of woody species (Bazzaz 1996).…”
Section: Differences Between Groups Of Species In Their Ability To Comentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations