2020
DOI: 10.1080/09638199.2020.1795703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does sub-sectoral FDI matter for trade in emerging economies? Evidence from nonlinear ARDL approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Services FDI accounts for 2/3 of the total FDI in the case of emerging economies, and it accounts for a commendable share in the country's output. Only a few studies have been conducted on the services sector FDI (Ramasamy & Yeung, 2010; Boddewyn et al, 1986; Kolstad & Villanger, 2008; Yin et al, 2014; Markusen & Strand, 2009; Yu & Walsh, 2010; Jithin and Sureshbabu, 2020, 2021). Some of the empirical studies suggest that there is no need for a separate theory to explain FDI in services (Kolstad & Villanger, 2008; Ramasamy & Yeung, 2010; Yin et al, 2014).…”
Section: Stylized Facts and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Services FDI accounts for 2/3 of the total FDI in the case of emerging economies, and it accounts for a commendable share in the country's output. Only a few studies have been conducted on the services sector FDI (Ramasamy & Yeung, 2010; Boddewyn et al, 1986; Kolstad & Villanger, 2008; Yin et al, 2014; Markusen & Strand, 2009; Yu & Walsh, 2010; Jithin and Sureshbabu, 2020, 2021). Some of the empirical studies suggest that there is no need for a separate theory to explain FDI in services (Kolstad & Villanger, 2008; Ramasamy & Yeung, 2010; Yin et al, 2014).…”
Section: Stylized Facts and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%