2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10641-005-3998-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Stream Morphology Predict the Home Range Size in Burbot?

Abstract: SynopsisTo determine whether burbot occupy defined home range in rivers, we radio-tracked individuals in the Ohrˇe River, Czech Republic. We also tested the hypothesis that the size of burbot home range would correlate with the fish mass. BurbotÕs strong attraction to suitable refuges was the basis for our second hypotheses, that its diurnal behavior would reflect refuge availability in the riverine environment. To test these hypotheses, we analyzed data on fish movements in relation to depth, velocity, substr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Burbot may select habitats with deep water; however, it is unclear if burbot preferentially select habitats for water depth or other habitat characteristics. For example, Slavík et al (2005) reported that burbot inhabited relatively shallow habitat with large substrate during daylight hours in the Ohŕe River, Czech Republic. Similarly, Dixon & Vokoun (2009) reported that depth was an important habitat characteristic in determining burbot presence, but that the importance of depth was conditional on substrate type and substrate embeddedness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burbot may select habitats with deep water; however, it is unclear if burbot preferentially select habitats for water depth or other habitat characteristics. For example, Slavík et al (2005) reported that burbot inhabited relatively shallow habitat with large substrate during daylight hours in the Ohŕe River, Czech Republic. Similarly, Dixon & Vokoun (2009) reported that depth was an important habitat characteristic in determining burbot presence, but that the importance of depth was conditional on substrate type and substrate embeddedness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wilding et al (2014) noted that, for several years, ecohydraulics research focused on the effects of velocity and depth on the channel habitats of fish and other aquatic species. Applications of numerous models such as IFIM have demonstrated that a stream can provide a range of velocity-depth combinations that support a wide range of species throughout their life stages (Shirvell and Dungey, 1983;Slavík et al, 2005). Previous studies have confirmed the correlation between the suitability curves characteristics and flow hydraulics, especially in relation to water depth and velocity (Davey et al, 2011;Macura et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Invertebrates respond to changes in flow and hydraulic changes (Mérigoux et al, 2009) but are less sensitive to morphological changes in regulated mountain streams (Holčík and Macura, 2001). Fish, however, are sensitive to morphological changes (Aparicio et al, 2011;Slavík et al, 2005). Furthermore, fish along with invertebrates are also sensitive to changes in water temperature, discharge (Lamouroux et al, 2006), and the quality of riparian vegetation (Džubáková et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are largely sedentary, ambush predators (Roberge et al 2002) but can have a relatively large range during feeding. There is evidence from other river systems that burbot actively move laterally in the river channel from bank to bank and vertically in the water column in their pursuit of prey that exhibit diel migration (Slavík et al 2005), but this behavior has not been confirmed in the Tanana River.…”
Section: Resident Migratorymentioning
confidence: 97%