2014
DOI: 10.1177/0022002713515403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does State Failure Cause Terrorism? An Empirical Analysis (1999–2008)

Abstract: A developed-world consensus ties state failure to new and serious international insecurity. But that conclusion rests upon an uncertain foundation; insights into the nature and intensity of failure-related threats remain tentative and unsystematic. This study begins to remedy the problem, examining the broad relationships between weakness, failure, and terrorism with panel data for 153 countries (1999–2008). I argue that the quantitative literature too often disregards the political context determining terrori… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The scientific research shows that manifold factors support terrorism (Enders et al, 2016;Coggins, 2015;Crenshaw, 1981). On the basis of the argument presented in this paper, we can therefore conclude that -in average-terrorism is also associated with high growth rates of population, combined with poverty, high income inequality and subsistence stress in society, ceteris paribus.…”
Section: Concluding Observations and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The scientific research shows that manifold factors support terrorism (Enders et al, 2016;Coggins, 2015;Crenshaw, 1981). On the basis of the argument presented in this paper, we can therefore conclude that -in average-terrorism is also associated with high growth rates of population, combined with poverty, high income inequality and subsistence stress in society, ceteris paribus.…”
Section: Concluding Observations and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Many studies analyze the direct and indirect determinants of terrorism (Abadie, 2005;Crenshaw, 1981;Newman, 2006;Freytag et al, 2011;McAllister & Schmid, 2011), though predictors of terrorism tend to be often not equal between different societies over the course of time (Krueger & Malečková, 2009). Some sources of terrorism are explained with economic factors (Enders et al, 2016;Blomberg et al, 2004;Hertog, 2010;Krueger & Malečková, 2002;Von Hippel, 2010), political factors (Coggins, 2015), social factors (Burgoon, 2006;Krueger & Malečková, 2002), etc. However, whether and how demographic factors cause and sustain terrorism is hardly known.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, anger is frequently generated by attributional and appraisal processes (Berkowitz, ). In particular, anger on authorities and the government may arise, as terror is often attributed to government failure (Coggins, ). With the Boston Marathon terrorist attack as one example, intelligence services have been criticized for not having prevented the attack despite the fact that the terror suspects were already known (i.e., one was on a terrorist watchlist; Light, ).…”
Section: Emotional Responses To Terrorism Threatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that we are not establishing any causal relationship due to potential endogeneity concerns between terrorism and its determinants (Coggins 2015;Jetter and Stadelmann 2017). Although all explanatory variables have been included lagged one year trying to mitigate the possible presence of reverse causation, this might not be a completely satisfactory solution if terror persists over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%