2008
DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2008.11760712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Standing Protect Bone Density in Patients With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury?

Abstract: Background/Objective: To compare the t-scores of proximal femur and lumbar spine of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) with different levels of weight bearing. Methods: Cross-sectional study comparing 3 groups of patients with SCI: patients with daily standing times of more than 1 hour, patients with daily standing times of less than 1 hour, and nonstanding patients. Seventy-one patients with chronic SCI were recruited. They were assigned to 1 of 3 groups according to their reported daily standing time. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(13 reference statements)
2
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies have failed to find an effect of various exercise loading protocols on leg bone in SCI . However, our results support the few previous studies that found high exercise volume (magnitude × frequency) effective in improving bone health.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most studies have failed to find an effect of various exercise loading protocols on leg bone in SCI . However, our results support the few previous studies that found high exercise volume (magnitude × frequency) effective in improving bone health.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Bone remodels continuously in response to applied stresses and strains, and these adaptations are central to maintain bone mass and ensure sufficient bone strength. However, interventions that load sublesional bone in SCI (eg, standing frame, body‐weight‐supported treadmill walking, functional electrical stimulation‐ [FES‐] cycling) have rarely been shown to have even a modest effect, if any effect at all . This could be because of insufficient loading intensity (magnitude, number of cycles, and duration) to promote changes in bone density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Moreover, in chronic SCI patients, daily standing (41 h) showed no significant change in mean t-score of the proximal femur region. 32 In acute SCI patients (8-12 weeks after SCI), however, passive standing (41 h) was capable of preserving bone mass and improving BMD as compared with those of non-standing patients (42 years after SCI). 33 Thus, the mechanical loading interventions, such as vibration or weight-bearing, during the early stage of SCI appear potent for preventing bone loss and maintaining bone mass.…”
Section: Effects Of Vibration Stimulus On Bone In Sci Ratsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Studien über die Effekte von nichtpharmakologischen Interventionen wie Steh-oder Gehtraining (17,(54)(55)(56), Sport (34,56,57), Vibration (58)…”
Section: Nichtpharmakologische Ansätzeunclassified