2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10533-020-00653-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does soil organic carbon quality or quantity govern relative temperature sensitivity in soil aggregates?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Temperature accounted variability for labile C fractions was significantly higher in sandy soil than clayey soil ( Table 1B ). Wankhede et al (2020) , Rittl et al (2020) , Takriti et al (2018) , Ghosh et al (2016) , Frøseth & Bleken (2015) and Hobley et al (2014) found that temperature impacts on labile C fractions was higher in coarse (sandy) than fine (clayey) soils owing to low physical protection, small specific areas, fewer reactive sites, and weak ligand exchange bridges, where soil C could be sorbed and protected. In present study, unlike the labile C fractions, the increase in temperature (T1–T5) caused a significant ( P < 0.05) and continuous increase in the sensitivity and decomposition of recalcitrant (ROC) and stable (TOC) C fractions ( Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Temperature accounted variability for labile C fractions was significantly higher in sandy soil than clayey soil ( Table 1B ). Wankhede et al (2020) , Rittl et al (2020) , Takriti et al (2018) , Ghosh et al (2016) , Frøseth & Bleken (2015) and Hobley et al (2014) found that temperature impacts on labile C fractions was higher in coarse (sandy) than fine (clayey) soils owing to low physical protection, small specific areas, fewer reactive sites, and weak ligand exchange bridges, where soil C could be sorbed and protected. In present study, unlike the labile C fractions, the increase in temperature (T1–T5) caused a significant ( P < 0.05) and continuous increase in the sensitivity and decomposition of recalcitrant (ROC) and stable (TOC) C fractions ( Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 and 3 ). Wankhede et al (2020) and Zheng et al (2019) examined that in sandy (coarse) soils the temperature response of recalcitrant and stable C fractions was much higher due to weak physical protection, fewer cations bridges, unstable moisture availability, and their low storing ability. The response of C fractions to temperature was in the order recalcitrant C fractions > stable C fractions > labile C fractions ( Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, understanding the Q 10 of microbial activity could improve our understanding of the potential effect of global warming and soil C dynamics in terrestrial ecosystem models (Ding et al, 2016; Schuur et al, 2015). Previous studies illustrated that Q 10 values are influenced by SOC quality (Davidson & Janssens, 2006; Jia et al, 2019; Wankhede et al, 2020). The 'C‐quality temperature' hypothesis of enzyme kinetic theory predicts that the decomposition of low‐quality C substrates in the subsoil is more sensitive to temperature change that requires a high activation energy (Qin et al, 2019; Rumpel & Kögel‐Knabner, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Soil aggregates are the basic units of soil structure, and they represent dense porous structures formed by the cementation of soil mineral particles and SOC (Wankhede et al 2020). Soil aggregation can cause the spatial separation of organisms and SOC, which is considered an important physical protection mechanism of SOC stability (Bird et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%