1997
DOI: 10.2307/2266054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Soil Change Cause Vegetation Change or Vice Versa? A Temporal Perspective from Hungary

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.Abstract. The long-term relationship between major climatic change, vegetation change, and soil development is complex and poorly understood. In northeastern Hungary, for exampl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
84
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(27 reference statements)
3
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Few studies have attempted to reconstruct soil genesis using the geochemistry of lake or peat bog sediments (Mackereth, 1966;Engstrom and Hansen, 1985;Ford, 1990;Hu et al, 1993;Willis et al, 1997;Ewing and Nater, 2002;Slaymaker et al, 2003). Lacustrine sediment records yield a better temporal resolution of significant events in soil formation than the chronosequence approach based on substituting space for time (Ewing and Nater, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few studies have attempted to reconstruct soil genesis using the geochemistry of lake or peat bog sediments (Mackereth, 1966;Engstrom and Hansen, 1985;Ford, 1990;Hu et al, 1993;Willis et al, 1997;Ewing and Nater, 2002;Slaymaker et al, 2003). Lacustrine sediment records yield a better temporal resolution of significant events in soil formation than the chronosequence approach based on substituting space for time (Ewing and Nater, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lithology, pollen Szafer (1948), Alexandrowicz (1984a, b), Harmata (1995) P4 Jasiel Lithology, pollen Harmata (1987Harmata ( , 2008 Hydrobiologia (2009) 631:3-28 7 (1987), Alexandrowicz (1988) Hydrobiologia (2009) Lithology, pollen, geochemistry archaeology Willis et al (1997Willis et al ( , 1998, Somogyi et al (1998), Szalóki et al (1999) Magyari et al (1999Magyari et al ( , 2000Magyari et al ( , 2001, Sümegi et al (2008) (565) hiatus Lithology, pollen, diatom Péterfi (1974), Fȃrcaş et al (1999), Fȃrcaş et al (2003Fȃrcaş et al ( , 2006a Lithology, pollen Tanţȃu et al (2003a, b), Tanţȃu and Fȃrcaş (2005), Tanţȃu (2006), Fȃrcaş et al (2003, 2006a Lithology, pollen Tanţȃu andFȃrcaş (2004) Tanţȃu (2006), Fȃrcaş e...…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th ere are numerous investigations of fl ora, fauna, vegetation, and history of these mires (e.g. Borics 2001, Boros 1924, 1926, 1964, Czenthe 1985, Jakab et al 1998, Lájer 1998a, b, Máthé and Kovács 1958, Mahunka 1991, Megyeri 1958, 1962, 1965, Nagy 2002, Nagy et al 1998, Pócs et al 1958, Simon 1953, Uherkovics 1979, 1981, Willis et al 1997, Zólyomi 1931), but only a few have been published on water chemical data. Megyeri (1958Megyeri ( , 1962Megyeri ( , 1965 investigated the invertebrate fauna of peat moss dominated mires (e.g.…”
Section: Studia Bot Hung 48(2) 2017mentioning
confidence: 99%