2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does socioeconomic status moderate the political divide on climate change? The roles of education, income, and individualism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
67
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
6
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5b). These results are consistent with existing studies that characterize education as a crucial condition for climate change belief in China, but as irrelevant or even counter-productive for inspiring climate change belief in the United States 15,72,73 . Figure 5c indicates that regional effects are most important for correctly predicting climate change belief in the Middle East, Central Asia, and in East Asia.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…5b). These results are consistent with existing studies that characterize education as a crucial condition for climate change belief in China, but as irrelevant or even counter-productive for inspiring climate change belief in the United States 15,72,73 . Figure 5c indicates that regional effects are most important for correctly predicting climate change belief in the Middle East, Central Asia, and in East Asia.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Individualism is further associated with political beliefs opposing "Big Government", preferring personal autonomy over governmental interference (Kahan et al, 2011). For example, people with more individualistic worldviews are more likely to oppose vaccinations programs and dismiss climate change prevention policies-despite the scientific evidence that they benefit both individuals and collectivesbecause of the perceived associations with government control (Ballew et al, 2020;Hornsey et al, 2018). Thus, the current research also complements research aimed at understanding opposition to collectively beneficial government policies (see implications below) insomuch as dissatisfaction with one's relationships offers a potential mechanism that may explain how people become more individualistically and populistically oriented over time (Huang et al, 2020;Lüders et al, 2020;Reis, 2012;Torcal, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, through discussion, the person attempting to persuade the other asks their conversation partner to connect themselves to the issue, rather than doing so through a persuasive appeal. When deploying this strategy in service of climate action, this might include probing people about how caring for the natural environment aligns with their religious faith, 18,[32][33][34] racial, ethnic, gender, or socio-economic identity, [35][36][37][38][39][40][41] or any other issue of high personal importance. Another promising approach, as we discuss in the next section, is to encourage people to reflect on their own legacy.…”
Section: Deep Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%