Does socioeconomic status influence oral cancer awareness? The role of public education

Azimi, Somayyeh; Ghorbani, Zahra; Ghasemi, Erfan; Tennant, Marc; Kruger, Estie

doi:10.26719/emhj.20.060

Cited by 10 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 34 publications

(68 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Most of the previous literature and people generally believed that those with a higher education level and higher living standard have higher awareness of oral cancer [ 25 – 27 ]. According to the results of this survey, the main factors affecting people's awareness of oral cancer were age, living standards, and oral hygiene habits.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A survey of the awareness and knowledge of oral cancer among residents in Beijing

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The present study aimed to investigate oral cancer awareness and its related knowledge among residents in Beijing. Methods A questionnaire survey was conducted among Beijing residents concerning their knowledge of oral cancer, and its prevention and treatment. Results A total of 3055 questionnaires were completed, 45.8% by males and 54.2% by females. The ages of the respondents ranged from 15 to 93 years; 12.4% were smokers, 1.1% chewed betel nuts, and 82.5% brushed their teeth at least twice a day. Lung cancer was heard of by the most respondents, followed by gastric cancer and liver cancer; oral cancer was the least heard of. More than 60% of respondents were unaware of the risk factors and early signs of oral cancer. Conclusions This survey demonstrated a general lack of public awareness and knowledge about oral cancer. Specific measures should be taken to improve public awareness of oral cancer and its prevention and treatment.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A survey of the awareness and knowledge of oral cancer among residents in Beijing

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Unlike previous studies that demonstrate low levels of knowledge regarding the carcinogenic effects of areca (betel) nut [ 13 , 15 , 16 ], three-quarters of the respondents in our study reported they were aware of this as a risk factor. The higher level of knowledge could be due to the fact the Indians in our study were more highly educated (close to 90% graduates) and economically well-off when compared to the past literature (85% completed high school and 69% employed) [ 15 ] as there is clear evidence showing both these factors are linked to increased oral cancer awareness [ 55 , 56 ]. It was perhaps unsurprising that the demographic profile of the current study sample was different to other developed countries given Australia has had a selective immigration policy focusing primarily on highly skilled migrants [ 57 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Indian Immigrants in Australia towards Oral Cancer and Their Perceived Role of General Practitioners: A Cross-Sectional Study

Saraswat

Everett

Pillay

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Oral cancer is highly prevalent in the Indian subcontinent. With the increasing immigration of Indians to Australia, a potential rise in oral cancer cases can be expected if they continue engaging in oral cancer risk practices. Unfortunately, little is known on this topic in the Australian context. This study aimed to generate new insights into this area by examining Indian immigrants’ knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding oral cancer in Australia and their perceived role of general practitioners in raising oral cancer awareness. Exploring these aspects could determine the oral cancer risk behaviours of Indians in Australia along with any contributing factors which could help identify potential preventative strategies. A cross-sectional survey was undertaken of 164 Indians across Australia. Data were analysed using SPSS software with descriptive statistics. Respondents had varying levels of knowledge about oral cancer (mean total score 61%), particularly around risk factors such as alcohol and areca nut use as well as oral cancer-related signs/symptoms. The majority (87.7%) had not received any information about oral cancer in a health care setting but were receptive (71–90%) to general practitioners playing a more active role in this area. Respondents were engaging in positive preventative oral health care though few were currently (6.7%) or previously (14.7%) chewing tobacco preparations. Further research is needed through larger studies to confirm the study findings and inform the development of culturally tailored strategies particularly involving general practitioners, to raise oral cancer awareness and provide early screening for Indian immigrants.

show abstract

“…Adults from the lowest quintile of wealth index had significantly lower awareness and knowledge of oral cancer. 41 Similarly, Villwock et al found that low-income status contributes to delays in seeking intervention among patients with epistaxis; patients who delayed seeking intervention had worse outcomes. 42 Further, having Medicaid insurance has been associated with lower economic status and lower rates of education.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Racial Disparities in Charges, Length of Stay, and Complications Following Adult Inpatient Epistaxis Treatment

Randhawa

Tseng

et al. 2022

Am J Rhinol�Allergy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Although recent studies have identified an association between race and adverse outcomes in head and neck surgeries, there are limited data examining the impact of racial disparities on adult inpatient outcomes following epistaxis management procedures. Objective To analyze the association between race and adverse outcomes in hospitalized patients undergoing epistaxis treatment. Methods This retrospective cohort analysis utilized the 2003 to 2014 National Inpatient Sample. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes were used to identify cases with a primary diagnosis of epistaxis that underwent a procedure for epistaxis control. Cases with missing data were excluded. Higher total charges and prolonged length of stay (LOS) were indicated by values greater than the 75th percentile. Demographics, hospital characteristics, Elixhauser comorbidity score, and complications were compared among race cohorts using univariate chi-square analysis and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The independent effect of race on adverse outcomes was analyzed using multivariate binary logistic regression while adjusting for the aforementioned variables. Results Of the 83 356 cases of epistaxis included, 80.3% were White, 12.5% Black, and 7.2% Hispanic. Black patients had increased odds of urinary/renal complications (odds ratio [OR] 2.148, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.797-2.569, P < .001) compared to White patients. Additionally, Black patients experienced higher odds of prolonged LOS (OR 1.227, 95% CI 1.101-1.367, P < .001) and higher total charges (OR 1.257, 95% CI 1.109-1.426, P < .001) compared to White patients. Similarly, Hispanic patients were more likely to experience urinary/renal complications (OR 1.605, 95% CI 1.244-2.071, P < .001), higher total charges (OR 1.519, 95% CI 1.302-1.772, P < .001), and prolonged LOS (OR 1.157, 95% CI 1.007-1.331, P = .040) compared to White patients. Conclusion Race is an important factor associated with an increased incidence of complications in hospitalized patients treated for epistaxis.

show abstract

Does socioeconomic status influence oral cancer awareness? The role of public education

Cited by 10 publications

References 34 publications

A survey of the awareness and knowledge of oral cancer among residents in Beijing

A survey of the awareness and knowledge of oral cancer among residents in Beijing

Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Indian Immigrants in Australia towards Oral Cancer and Their Perceived Role of General Practitioners: A Cross-Sectional Study

Racial Disparities in Charges, Length of Stay, and Complications Following Adult Inpatient Epistaxis Treatment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About