2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does sleep-dependent consolidation favour weak memories?

Abstract: Sleep stabilizes newly acquired memories, a process referred to as memory consolidation. According to recent studies, sleep-dependent consolidation processes might be deployed to different extents for different types of memories. In particular, weaker memories might benefit greater from post-learning sleep than stronger memories. However, under standard testing conditions, sleep-dependent consolidation effects for stronger memories might be obscured by ceiling effects. To test this possibility, we devised a ne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A common thread is that all of these studies assessed memory for individual items (e.g., object pictures), rather than meaningful narrative events. It is possible that, lacking an obvious organization (e.g., narratives), inter-item associations in these studies were initially weak (Petzka et al, 2021;Schapiro et al, 2018), such that these items could more easily interfere with each other in memory. If so, these item-based paradigms may have provided more of an opportunity for sleep to strengthen associations (Lewis & Durrant, 2011) or reduce interference (Yonelinas et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A common thread is that all of these studies assessed memory for individual items (e.g., object pictures), rather than meaningful narrative events. It is possible that, lacking an obvious organization (e.g., narratives), inter-item associations in these studies were initially weak (Petzka et al, 2021;Schapiro et al, 2018), such that these items could more easily interfere with each other in memory. If so, these item-based paradigms may have provided more of an opportunity for sleep to strengthen associations (Lewis & Durrant, 2011) or reduce interference (Yonelinas et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Our findings did not provide consistent support for this hypothesis. Although this null result might be seen as a challenge to consolidation theories, it is important to note that several studies have demonstrated that sleep-dependent consolidation can reorganize information in memory (e.g., Antony et al, 2018;Liu & Ranganath, 2019;Petzka et al, 2021;Saletin et al, 2011;Schapiro et al, 2017). For example, Liu and Ranganath (2019) found that sleep-dependent memory consolidation was necessary for temporally distant, semantically related pictures of objects to exhibit retrieval facilitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is nevertheless important to consider that memory retention at baseline was generally poorer for implausible than plausible noun-colour pairings, suggesting that implausible associations were more weakly encoded than their plausible counterparts. Because previous work has shown that the memory benefits of sleep are more robust for weakly relative to strongly encoded materials (Denis et al, 2021(Denis et al, , 2020Payne, Chambers, & Kensinger, 2012;Schmidt et al, 2006, but also see Petzka et al, 2021), the amplified overnight memory gains for implausible (vs plausible) memories observed in the current study might reflect an impact of memory strength, rather than schematic congruency, on sleep-associated consolidation. Yet, if this were the case, a three-way interaction should have emerged in our Group * Rehearsal Strategy * Plausibility ANOVA, with the weakest memories (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…Contemporary models of sleep-associated memory processing propose that memories are reactivated during sleep, and thereby integrated into long-term storage (Antony et al, 2019;Diekelmann & Born, 2010;Klinzing, Niethard, & Born, 2019;Lewis & Durrant, 2011;Rasch & Born, 2007. However, sleep does not benefit all memories equally, with accumulating evidence suggesting that overnight memory gains are more robust for weakly encoded than strongly encoded materials (Denis et al, 2021(Denis et al, , 2020Payne, Chambers, & Kensinger, 2012;Schmidt et al, 2006, but also see Petzka et al, 2021). Relatedly, efforts to enhance overnight consolidation via memory cueing in sleep are most effective when pre-sleep learning performance is low (Cairney, Lindsay, Sobczak, Paller, & Gaskell, 2016;Creery, Oudiette, Antony, & Paller, 2015;Schechtman et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, growing empirical evidence has shown that a certain minimum level of memory strength at encoding is necessary for the sleep benefit to occur (e.g., Denis et al, 2020;Muehlroth et al, 2020;Rauchs et al, 2011). More specifically, floor effects might counteract memory consolidation benefits during sleep when encoding strength is very low (Petzka et al, 2021). In contrast, when encoding strength increases beyond a medium level up to very high levels, then sleep benefits should decrease again.…”
Section: Focal Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%