Does similarity trigger cooperation? Dyadic effect of similarity in social value orientation and cognitive resources on cooperation

Abstract

Although a considerable amount of research has demonstrated a robust relationship between social value orientation and cooperation, these studies may be limited by focusing solely on the individual. Building on the growing literature documenting the effect of group formation on cooperation and personality similarity on negotiation, the present study explored whether similarity in social value orientation (both being pro-social or pro-self) leads to more cooperation in social dilemmas among dyad members. Drawing from expectancy theory and the concept of cognitive resources, we further predicted that the relationship between similarity in social value orientation and cooperation uniquely depends on whether the individual is cognitively busy. To test our hypothesis, we grouped our participants according to their social value orientation into three different dyads (similar-pro-self, similar-pro-social, and pro-self-pro-social) to complete a repeated prisoner’s dilemma task, and controlled their cognitive resources using a simultaneous digit memory task. The results suggested that (1) heterogeneous dyads’ (pro-self-pro-social) cooperation possibility experience a steeper decay as the number of rounds increases compared with the two homogeneous dyads (similar-pro-self, similar-pro-social). In addition, (2) similarity in social value orientation, interacting with participants’ cognitive resources, significantly influenced individual-level cooperation. Specifically, both pro-selfs and pro-socials, paired with unlike-minded counterparts, were more cooperative when they had abundant cognitive resources. However, cognitive resources had no significant influence on dyads with similar social value orientation. Overall, these findings demonstrate the importance of considering personality configuration when attempting to understand cooperation in social dilemmas among dyads. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12144-022-03276-8.

Validation of cooperative and competitive interactive tasks in dominant and subordinate sibling pairs.

“…The higher Machiavellian and competitiveness traits in this group may also have contributed to the defective and less cooperative behavior as observed in previous game theory tasks 42,53,74,75 . Similar to our task, the temptation to exploit others predicted cooperation in the CG task 76 , while in the PD task, the possibility of achieving dyad-level cooperation was larger in cooperative dyads, heterogeneous dyads, and non-cooperative (pro-self) dyads in descendent order, but the difference was not significant 37 . This pattern has been replicated in children where cooperative dyads used a turn-taking strategy in a modified version of the CG, while among pairs who did not adopt that strategy, the dominant children got higher payoffs 77 .…”

“…When studying cooperation and competition, which are intrinsically interpersonal activities, a focus on only one person within a dyad is theoretically deficient 37 . We need to characterize behavior in the context of with whom someone is interacting.…”

“…To adequately address the study of interpersonal exchange, including cooperation and competition, it is essential to focus on both individuals within a dyad 37 . In particular, prior literature reveals that it matters with whom the interaction takes place, with the degree of willingness to cooperate or compete associated with the partner's personality 38,39 .…”

Sustainable luxury brands: the moderating effects of salient identity-based goals

“…This study associates “luxury” and “sustainable” with pro-self and prosocial orientations, using the SVO framework to understand consumers’ sustainable luxury consumption. The SVO framework has been widely used in behavioral science research, including studies on helping behavior and prosocial/pro-environmental behavior (Sun et al , 2021; Zhang et al , 2023). As a personality trait, SVO reflects individual differences (Messick and McClintock, 1968), with varying degrees between pro-self and prosocial orientations (Bogaert et al , 2010).…”

The role of dominance in sibling relationships: differences in interactive cooperative and competitive behavior

“…To adequately study interpersonal exchange, it is essential to focus on both individuals within a dyad 32 . The willingness to cooperate or compete is influenced by the partner’s personality 33 , 34 .…”