Abstract:In order to get bounce and movement seam bowlers need to bowl the ball "into" the pitch. Standard deliveries by elite players are typically projected at around 7° below horizontal. In contrast, young players currently often need to release the ball almost horizontally in an effort to get the ball to bounce close enough to the batter. We anticipated that shortening the pitch could be a simple way to help young bowlers to release the ball at a better angle and with more consistency. Twenty county or best in club… Show more
“…Second, children using appropriately sized equipment will learn to form functional synergies (i.e., the coupling and de-coupling of joints at the appropriate times) to stabilize salient and invariant performance variables. These predictions are congruent with the growing number of studies demonstrating the beneficial effects of scaling the task and equipment in children's sports on motor performance and learning 10,11,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] ; albeit, the current study advances this literature by objectively measuring movement control and coordination.…”
Children’s movement coordination is significantly influenced by the equipment used when performing multi-articular actions. Previously we reported that scaled equipment (smaller racket and a softer ball), but not full-sized equipment, promoted a functional coupling between upper arm and forearm angles in children performing a forehand. However, it remains unclear whether the shoulder-racket distance—which is controlled by this coupling—is a performance variable. This study therefore advanced previous research by examining whether the shoulder-racket distance is associated with performance. We also improved our understanding of how the shoulder-racket distance is controlled by including the hand-racket segment in our biomechanical model. Twenty-one children performed 40 forehands in a hitting for accuracy task. Participants were randomly divided into two groups—a scaled equipment group and a full-sized equipment group. Results revealed that the shoulder-racket distance was a performance variable, as evidenced by: (a) its variance reduced closer to ball impact, (b) its distance at ball impact, but not at the start of the forward swing, differentiated good from poor performance, and (c) its distance was similar for both groups, implying that there was a “sweet spot” for striking a ball, regardless of racket size. We also showed that it is the shoulder-racket vector in state-space (i.e., distance and angle) that differentiates good from poor performance. Finally, the manner in which the shoulder-racket distance was controlled differed between the groups, with scaled equipment promoting a more distal control than full-sized equipment. Implications for skill acquisition are discussed.
“…Second, children using appropriately sized equipment will learn to form functional synergies (i.e., the coupling and de-coupling of joints at the appropriate times) to stabilize salient and invariant performance variables. These predictions are congruent with the growing number of studies demonstrating the beneficial effects of scaling the task and equipment in children's sports on motor performance and learning 10,11,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] ; albeit, the current study advances this literature by objectively measuring movement control and coordination.…”
Children’s movement coordination is significantly influenced by the equipment used when performing multi-articular actions. Previously we reported that scaled equipment (smaller racket and a softer ball), but not full-sized equipment, promoted a functional coupling between upper arm and forearm angles in children performing a forehand. However, it remains unclear whether the shoulder-racket distance—which is controlled by this coupling—is a performance variable. This study therefore advanced previous research by examining whether the shoulder-racket distance is associated with performance. We also improved our understanding of how the shoulder-racket distance is controlled by including the hand-racket segment in our biomechanical model. Twenty-one children performed 40 forehands in a hitting for accuracy task. Participants were randomly divided into two groups—a scaled equipment group and a full-sized equipment group. Results revealed that the shoulder-racket distance was a performance variable, as evidenced by: (a) its variance reduced closer to ball impact, (b) its distance at ball impact, but not at the start of the forward swing, differentiated good from poor performance, and (c) its distance was similar for both groups, implying that there was a “sweet spot” for striking a ball, regardless of racket size. We also showed that it is the shoulder-racket vector in state-space (i.e., distance and angle) that differentiates good from poor performance. Finally, the manner in which the shoulder-racket distance was controlled differed between the groups, with scaled equipment promoting a more distal control than full-sized equipment. Implications for skill acquisition are discussed.
“…In junior cricket, Harwood, Yeadon, & King (2018a) showed that playing measures (such as the number of playable deliveries and amount of running between the wickets) and player involvement improved when under-10s and under-11s played on a 16-yard pitch (as recommended by a high-level coach) compared with 19-or 20yard pitches. Shortening the pitch encouraged top bowlers in those age groups to release the ball with a more downward trajectory (Harwood, Yeadon, & King, 2018b); on average they bowled standard deliveries at 4.2° below horizontal on 16 yards (14.63 m) compared to 0.7° below on 19 yards (17.37 m), much closer to the 7° below horizontal found for elite pace bowlers (Cork, Justham, & West, 2012;Justham, West, & Cork, 2008;Worthington, 2010). Bowling on pitches which are disproportionately long, requires young players to change the way they release the ball as they "grow into" the pitch length, something also noted by Whiteside, Elliott, Lay, & Reid (2013) in relation to tennis serving.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Model inputs Harwood et al (2018b) gathered ball release data from twenty under-11 male, right-arm county or top club seam bowlers. Each bowled 12 standard deliveries at their usual pace on both a 19-yard (17.37 m) and a 16-yard (14.63 m) pitch at an indoor practice facility, using a leather, four-piece, 135 g junior ball (Table 1).…”
Studies in several sports have shown the benefits of adapting the playing environment to fit junior players. Frequently the changes are pragmatic choices based on space constraints or existing line markings, or the result of simple scaling based on stature. In this study, a method of scaling the cricket pitch length is presented which is based on the age-specific size and performance of the bowlers and batters. The objective was a pitch length which enabled young bowlers to bowl good length deliveries while releasing the ball at a more downward angle, similar to elite bowlers. The steeper release angle has the benefit of reducing the sensitivity of the ball flight distance to the variability of ball release. Based on data from county standard under-10 and under-11 players a pitch length of 16.22 yards (14.83 m) was calculated, 19% shorter than previously recommended for under-11s in England. A shorter pitch also increases the temporal challenge for batters, encouraging a wider variety of shots and improved anticipation skills. Pitch lengths scaled in this way to fit the players' abilities as they develop will enable a more consistent ball release by bowlers and more consistent temporal demand for batters.
“…A shorter pitch will add to the time pressure on the batter even though the bowling isn't faster (Elliott, Plunkett, & Alderson, 2005;Harwood, Yeadon, & King, 2018b): the ball arrives in the hitting area sooner, even though it is in the area for the same amount of time. This reduced time to choose the appropriate shot imposes a task constraint on the batters which will increase their need to attend more to the predelivery movements of the bowlers and should encourage the development of the anticipation skills that batters need to progress towards expertise (Penrose & Roach, 1995;Weissensteiner et al, 2008).…”
This study sought to determine whether playing on a shorter cricket pitch would lead batters to make more appropriate decisions about whether to play front foot or back foot shots. Based on an analysis of the shots played by top order batters against seam bowling in county under-10 matches, an age-specific "good length" region between 5.0 yards and 6.5 yards (4.57 to 5.94 m) from the batters' stumps was derived. This was where batters were uncertain whether to play on the front or back foot. It was then possible to define deliveries as "short" or "full" depending upon whether they bounced further from or nearer to the batter than the good length region. Club under-11 and county under-10 match data revealed that when playing on a 16 yard pitch batters played more back foot shots to short balls and county batters also played more front foot shots to full balls compared with matches on the currently recommended 20 or 19 yard pitches. For batters a shorter pitch should strengthen the coupling between perception of delivery length and appropriate shot selection, and the increased task demand should lead to improved anticipation, both key features of skilled batting.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.