2013
DOI: 10.1080/09243453.2013.840319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does school-to-school collaboration promote school improvement? A study of the impact of school federations on student outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
61
0
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
61
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…There was clear evidence of an increase in pupil attainment, providing replication in the primary sector of results previously obtained in studies of secondary schools (Chapman & Muijs, 2014), and confirmation of the theoretical support for collaboration as a form of school improvement. Of course, some caveats need to be taken into account.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There was clear evidence of an increase in pupil attainment, providing replication in the primary sector of results previously obtained in studies of secondary schools (Chapman & Muijs, 2014), and confirmation of the theoretical support for collaboration as a form of school improvement. Of course, some caveats need to be taken into account.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The gains were strongest in the low performing schools, but modest improvements were also present in some high performing schools. A follow-up study (Chapman & Muijs, 2014) confirmed these findings, and also showed that those 'performance federations' that had stronger structuring of their collaboration showed stronger gains. The follow-up study also used telephone interviews to gather some of the reasons for collaborating and some of the perceived benefits, but this qualitative component was limited in scope, and did not allow sufficient exploration of reasons for the effectiveness of collaborations between stronger and weaker schools, or for the finding of differential effectiveness of individual performance federations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…External support may also be helpful in cases where internal capacity or trust between schools may be lacking (Muijs, West, and Ainscow 2010, 24 circumstances which he argued should include: generating positive relationships; focusing on teaching and learning; understanding, leading and managing changes; committing to continuous professional development; building community; and, drawing on external support. In more recent research on using collaboration and networking as a means of school improvement, Chapman and Muijs (2014) conducted a large quantitative study (122 federations and 264 comparator schools) which examined the relationships between school federations and student outcomes. They developed a typology of federations used to describe the nature of collaborative relationships and structural arrangements between two or more schools.…”
Section: A New Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their latest research on using collaboration and networking as a means of school improvement Chapman and Muijs (2013) conducted a large quantitative study (122 federations and 264 comparator schools) which examined the relationships between school federations and student outcomes. They developed a typology of federations (used to describe the nature of collaborative relationships and structural arrangements between two or more schools).…”
Section: Shared Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%