1986
DOI: 10.1016/0749-5978(86)90035-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does salary discussion hurt the developmental performance appraisal?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…New companies that placed a high value on their employees (as coded from prospectuses) and that included high levels of organizational-performance-based pay had dramatically higher five-year survival rates (92%) than those who were low on both dimensions (34%: . In a field study of nine different sites, Prince & Lawler (1986) found that salary discussions had positive rather than negative effects on employee attitudes and subsequent performance improvement. In addition, the positive effects were strongest for those with lower initial performance and where initial perceptions of performance were most discrepant between supervisors and employees.…”
Section: Results: What Hr Professionals Believementioning
confidence: 97%
“…New companies that placed a high value on their employees (as coded from prospectuses) and that included high levels of organizational-performance-based pay had dramatically higher five-year survival rates (92%) than those who were low on both dimensions (34%: . In a field study of nine different sites, Prince & Lawler (1986) found that salary discussions had positive rather than negative effects on employee attitudes and subsequent performance improvement. In addition, the positive effects were strongest for those with lower initial performance and where initial perceptions of performance were most discrepant between supervisors and employees.…”
Section: Results: What Hr Professionals Believementioning
confidence: 97%
“…The developmental purpose for performance appraisal involves within-individual comparisons, such as performance feedback, training needs, transfers, job assignments, and identification of strengths and weaknesses (Cleveland, Murphy, & Williams, 1989). There has been a long-standing debate in the human resource management literature concerning the tensions or perceived incompatibility of administrative and developmental appraisal purposes (Boswell & Boudreau, 2002;Meyer, Kay, & French, 1965;Prince & Lawler, 1986).…”
Section: Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For instance, career issues are usually near the top of the list of appraisal. Traditional wisdom holds that sessions assessing performance related to merit pay should be separate from discussions related to future growth and development (Wexley 1986) although this assumption has been challenged (Prince and Lawler 1986). In practice, however, most organizations in the United States and Canada still combine feedback sessions concerning salary action assessment with motivational and developmental appraisal.…”
Section: Choosing the Interview Formatmentioning
confidence: 98%