2023
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2365595/v3
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Rising Resources Income, Consumer Prices, Government Outlay, and Globalisation Hinder Africa's Sustainable Development?

Abstract: This study examined the long-term effect of contemporary challenges such as growing resource income, rising consumer prices, inefficient public spending, and globalisation on Africa's quest for sustainable development. A robust measure of sustainable development that integrates resource productivity is adopted. The study period spanned from 1991 to 2021, and data sourced from 24 African countries. The empirical output for this study is derived using long-term methodologies, including feasible generalised least… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 78 publications
(74 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measure suits well as it demonstrates output efficiency from productive behaviours and natural wealth since it is the ratio between GDP (the output index) and EF (the natural resource utilisation). Apart from the EF serving as an appropriate measure of natural resource consumption, it further defines man's impact on (built-up, arable, grazing, energy, and forest) land and fishing grounds (Aladejare and Musa, 2023). Also, Rees (2000) posited that EF is significantly equivalent to Ehrlich and Holdren's (1971) typical submission of man's environmental effect represented as 𝐼 = 𝑃𝐴𝑇; where 𝐼 denotes impact, 𝑃 shows population, 𝐴 is affluence, and 𝑇 expresses technology.…”
Section: Data and Methodology 31 Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measure suits well as it demonstrates output efficiency from productive behaviours and natural wealth since it is the ratio between GDP (the output index) and EF (the natural resource utilisation). Apart from the EF serving as an appropriate measure of natural resource consumption, it further defines man's impact on (built-up, arable, grazing, energy, and forest) land and fishing grounds (Aladejare and Musa, 2023). Also, Rees (2000) posited that EF is significantly equivalent to Ehrlich and Holdren's (1971) typical submission of man's environmental effect represented as 𝐼 = 𝑃𝐴𝑇; where 𝐼 denotes impact, 𝑃 shows population, 𝐴 is affluence, and 𝑇 expresses technology.…”
Section: Data and Methodology 31 Datamentioning
confidence: 99%