Does retirement affect secondary preventive care use? Evidence from breast cancer screening

Goldzahl, LÃ©ontine

doi:10.1016/j.ehb.2021.101061

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 89 publications

(184 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Neighborhood socioeconomic status was measured using the area deprivation index (ADI). Adverse contributions from SDoH were categorized based on previous literature investigating the impact of each factor on patient outcomes 9‐17 . SDoH were scored based on a protective or adverse classification.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Adverse contributions from SDoH were categorized based on previous literature investigating the impact of each factor on patient outcomes. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] SDoH were scored based on a protective or adverse classification. Higher total SDoH scores reflected a greater sum of adverse SDoH factors when analyzing cumulative effect.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Disentangling Social Determinants of Health and Rurality in Head and Neck Cancer 2‐Year Mortality

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Social determinants of health (SDoH) and rurality are known factors that may influence outcomes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Patients residing in remote locations or those with multiple SDoH may encounter barriers to initial diagnosis, adherence to multidisciplinary treatments, and posttreatment surveillance, which may impact their overall survival. However, previous studies have shown mixed results associated with rural residence. The aim of this study is to identify the impact of rurality and SDoH on 2‐year survival in HNSCC. The study was conducted using a Head and Neck Cancer Registry at a single institution from June 2018 through July 2022. Rurality, defined by US census scores, and individual measures of SDoH were used. Our results indicate that each additional adverse SDoH factor results in 1.5 times the odds of mortality at 2 years. Individualized measures of SDoH, rather than rurality alone, better reflect patient prognosis in HNSCC.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Disentangling Social Determinants of Health and Rurality in Head and Neck Cancer 2‐Year Mortality

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The effects of an increase in the retirement age on health — Evidence from administrative data

Barschkett

Geyer

Haan

et al. 2022

The Journal of the Economics of Ageing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Does retirement affect secondary preventive care use? Evidence from breast cancer screening

Abstract: Working papers of the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research receive only limited review. Views or opinions expressed in working papers are attributable to the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Institute.

Cited by 2 publications

References 89 publications

Disentangling Social Determinants of Health and Rurality in Head and Neck Cancer 2‐Year Mortality

Disentangling Social Determinants of Health and Rurality in Head and Neck Cancer 2‐Year Mortality

The effects of an increase in the retirement age on health — Evidence from administrative data

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About