Residential dissonance is the mismatch of land use patterns between individuals' actual and preferred neighbourhood type. It is a threat to land use based policy interventions, such as transit oriented development (TOD), aiming to enhance sustainable mobility behaviour. Dissonants in TOD are more likely to use the car and less likely to use public transport. They do not naturally adjust their preferences according to their surrounding land use patterns and continue their predisposition travel behaviour. Therefore, it is critical to identify dissonant groups to inform policy development to lessen the level of dissonance in TODs. This research identifies groups that are more likely to be dissonant in TOD/non-TOD areas in Brisbane. The living conditions of 6271 individuals were Downloaded by [La Trobe University] at 09:45 31 May 2016 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 2 classified into TOD or non-TOD types based on a cluster analysis of built environmentalfactors. Individuals" preferred neighbourhoods were also categorised into TOD and non-TOD types based on a factor analysis of travel attitudes and preferences. Four unique groups were identified (dissonants and consonants in both TOD and non-TOD areas) when respondents" actual and preferred neighbourhood types were combined. Binary logistic regression analyses were employed to identify the determinants of residential dissonance in TOD/non-TOD areas. The results indicate that 30% of the respondents living in TOD areas are dissonants. Being male, having car availability at all times, and individuals with poor health condition were more likely to be dissonants in TOD areas in Brisbane.