Does Research Training During Residency Promote Scholarship and Influence Career Choice? A Cross-Sectional Analysis of a 10-Year Cohort of the UCSF–PRIME Internal Medicine Residency Program

Kohlwes, Jeffrey; O’Brien, Bridget; Stanley, Marion; Grant, Ross; Shunk, Rebecca; Connor, Denise M.; Cornett, Patricia; Hollander, Harry

doi:10.1080/10401334.2016.1155460

Cited by 20 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…More frequent reports indicate that 25–35% of residents published or present papers during training [2,4]. Recent data regarding a large national survey of 252 internal medicine residency programs indicated that overall 36% of residents presented abstracts and 12% published manuscripts and 3% published book chapters.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In 2009, this was the main reason programs were cited for deficiencies. Numerous articles have been published regarding complex and costly methods to enhance scholarship [2–7]. The intent of the current paper is to discuss methods employed in a small, community-based internal medicine residency and to compare the results with recently published data.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Promoting scholarship in a community-based internal medicine residency

Fanciullo

Hsu

Stevens

2018

Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine Internal Medicine residency implemented a program to enhance scholarship among residents. This residency is part of a small Mid-Western community-based school.Background: A Director of Research was hired and developed a structured approach consisting of: 1. Independent study regarding research methods and statistical testing and 2. Mentoring of residents and faculty in scholarly pursuits starting in the first months of residency.Methods: Scholarship for two cohorts of residents for years July 2011–2014 and January 2014–2017 were followed. Products included papers accepted/published and papers accepted/presented at national or international meetings.Results: 7 (14.8%) of 47 residents in the first cohort published 12 papers (0.25 papers/resident) with 18 faculty as co-authors (1.5/paper). 20 (43.4%) of 46 residents in the second cohort (structured program) published 39 papers (0.85 papers/resident) with 80 faculty as co-authors (2.1/paper). The difference in papers was significant by chi-square analysis.Conclusion: A structured program requiring independent study in conjunction with individualized mentoring of scholarship starting early in the first postgraduate year was successful in significantly increasing the scholarly activity of our community-based internal medicine residents and faculty. With this program, the percentage of residents publishing exceeds national statistics recently reported.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Promoting scholarship in a community-based internal medicine residency

Fanciullo

Hsu

Stevens

2018

Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Some of the pathways that have been explored include appointing a dedicated director to facilitate resident research, 3 creating a comprehensive three-year research curriculum, 4 and developing a research-focused residency track. 5 Other specialties have created Resident Research Days, 6 structured research curricula, [7][8][9] and promoted a point-based reward system. 10 Such programs have resulted in increased scholarship by residents.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…10 Such programs have resulted in increased scholarship by residents. 4,5,[7][8][9] For example, one research curriculum implemented in a general surgery program incorporated structured mentoring with annual milestones. Resident publications increased by 720%.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

<p>Residents Take the Lead: A Modern Collaborative Approach to Research During Residency</p>

Atalay

Ard

Bethea

et al. 2020

AMEP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Participation in scholarship is a requirement for Internal Medicine (IM) residencies, but programs struggle to successfully integrate research into busy clinical schedules. In 2013, the IM residency at Brigham and Women's Hospital implemented the Housestaff Research Project (HRP)-a novel residency-wide research initiative designed to facilitate participation in scholarship. The HRP had two components-a formal research curriculum and an infrastructure that provided funding and mentorship for resident-led, housestaff wide projects. Methods: This is a mixed-methods study of 190 IM residents and two HRP-supported research projects. Seventy-seven residents responded to an electronic survey about their interests in research exposure in residency. Fifty-six residents responded to an electronic survey about their participation in the HRP. The success of HRP-supported projects was evaluated through resident comments, interviews with three residents leading the first two HRPs and a description of the success of the projects based on resident involvement and dissemination of the results. Results: Eighty-seven percent (n= 67/77) of residents were interested in additional research exposure during residency. Ninety-five percent (n = 53/56) of residents had heard of the HRP, and 77% had participate in at least one aspect of it. Approximately 20 residents were directly involved in the two resident-led projects. HRP-supported projects resulted in presentations at three local and three national conferences, one manuscript in press, and one manuscript in preparation. The resident project leaders felt that a strength and unique aspect of the HRP was the collaboration with co-residents. Conclusion: The HRP successfully created a culture of research and scholarship within the residency. The HRP leaders and residents that participated in HRP-supported projects expressed the most direct benefits from the program. All residents were exposed to research concepts and methods. Future directions for the HRP include selecting projects that maximize the number of resident participants and integrating a more robust research curriculum.

show abstract

“…4 Residents provided training in research are more likely to continue with scholarly pursuits after graduation. 6 However, scholarship incorporates more than research. A residency program can embrace the expanded definition of scholarship to enhance its outcome.…”

Section: Meeting Scholarly Activity Requirements In a Family Medicinementioning

confidence: 99%

Meeting Scholarly Activity Requirements in a Family Medicine Residency Program

Brown¹,

Miser²

2017

Ann Fam Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

487cine's current and future leaders to guide the use of new tools and new "ways of doing things" in the context of the valued relationship-based care that is at the core of our discipline.At our 40th birthday celebration, we will acknowledge our roots and continue to learn from the wealth of experience provided by many past chairs and administrators ("heritage members") who will attend this unique, integrated program. We also plan to challenge the future with sessions around introducing clinical innovations, the interface of technology and primary care, and "culture by design." Imagine what will happen over the next 10 years-what technology will appear and how can we lever that technology to best meet societal needs? More importantly, how can we lead against such threats to our nation's health as xenophobia and environmental degradation?In addition to our programming, we promise a wonderful annual dinner of fun, reminiscing, music from over the decades, and yes, singing. All past chairs and administrators are invited and we hope that many can make this "must attend" event!We will be collecting ADFM memorabilia and are establishing a new Heritage Speaker Fund. If you have any photos, books, or other memorabilia to share or if you have questions about contributions to the "heritage speaker" fund, please contact Priscilla Noland, ADFM's Administrative Director at: pnoland@adfm.org.

show abstract

Does Research Training During Residency Promote Scholarship and Influence Career Choice? A Cross-Sectional Analysis of a 10-Year Cohort of the UCSF–PRIME Internal Medicine Residency Program

Cited by 20 publications

References 13 publications

Promoting scholarship in a community-based internal medicine residency

Promoting scholarship in a community-based internal medicine residency

<p>Residents Take the Lead: A Modern Collaborative Approach to Research During Residency</p>

Meeting Scholarly Activity Requirements in a Family Medicine Residency Program

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About