2023
DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(22)00266-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does repeated influenza vaccination attenuate effectiveness? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, individuals stratified as non-responders received influenza vaccinations more frequently in previous years as compared to responders (information derived from medical questionnaire, see Table S1). This is in line with a systemic meta-analysis reporting that repeated vaccination attenuates vaccine effectiveness 55 . According to the theory of antigenic sin, vaccination history might contribute to differences in vaccine responsiveness.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Interestingly, individuals stratified as non-responders received influenza vaccinations more frequently in previous years as compared to responders (information derived from medical questionnaire, see Table S1). This is in line with a systemic meta-analysis reporting that repeated vaccination attenuates vaccine effectiveness 55 . According to the theory of antigenic sin, vaccination history might contribute to differences in vaccine responsiveness.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The majority of the reported cases were vaccinated, which indicates that although it does provide protection, the efficacy of the vaccine is not perfect. Previous studies on vaccine effectiveness reported the negative impact of repeated vaccination in children without prior history of natural infection [45][46][47][48] . The type of influenza vaccine may also play a role, since Japan uses the inactivated influenza vaccine while other countries (for example: UK) 42,49 use live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed differences in practical significance in seroconversion between the vaccination strains and circulating strains could explain the seasonal variability of the influence of vaccination history on observed vaccine effectiveness. [42,43] Future model development will incorporate the influence of the antigenic distance between successive vaccinating and circulating strains into the antibody kinetics framework. This could be done by using existing metrics of antigenic advance or considering the influence of vaccination on boosting HAI titres across various strain landscapes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%