Does religion matter to dividend policy? Evidence from Buddhism and Taoism in China

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the relation between Buddhism/Taoism and dividend payout decisions among Chinese listed firms during 2003-2013. Design/methodology/approach The authors include all Chinese A-share listed stocks in their sample during 2003-2013 and use a multiple regression method to conduct their analyses. Findings Their findings suggest that firms in regions with high influence of Buddhism and Taoism lean toward having high dividend payouts. The results are robust to a battery of alternative specifications in dividend payout, religiosity measures, research methods and dividend regulation regimes. Originality/value They show that the religions of Buddhism/Taoism play a role in determining dividend payout, complementing other informal institution studies of dividend policy. They complement the literature by providing insights into the impact of Buddhism and Taoism on corporate behaviors beyond immoral or unethical practices. They are able to relate specific doctrinal tenets of Buddhism and Taoism to corporate behavior rather than using only the general moral and ethical guidelines of religiosity.

Buddhism and M&A performance: Evidence from China

“…Ethics are essential to the growth of the economy (Clarke, 2016; Hansen, 1963; Iannaccone, 1998), whereas religion is considered to cause more ethical behaviours (Kirchmaier et al, 2018; Weaver & Agle, 2002). Numerous studies have examined the connection between religion (religiosity) and company decisions (Cao et al, 2016; Hilary & Hui, 2009), financial statement (Dyreng et al, 2012) and risk‐taking (Chintrakarn et al, 2017; Miller, 2000).…”

The geography of religions: Comparing Buddhist and Taoist sacred mountains in China

“…Buddhism emphasises the path to salvation in the secular world (Chen, 2006) and focuses on ways to transcend lives, ageing, sickness, mortality, and suffering (Radhakrishnan, 1953). Differences between them also exist in their ritual texts (Prude, 2011) and ideological (Liang, 2012; Yang, 2003), behavioural (Du, 2013; Vuong et al, 2018), and social (Cao et al, 2016; Su, 2019) contexts.…”

Cultural barriers, institutional distance, and spatial spillovers: Evidence from regional industrial evolution in China

“…Research on institutional economics shows that there is a substitution relationship between informal and formal institutions (Allen et al, 2005). When formal institutions are not perfect, informal institutions play an important role in promoting economic activities, but with the improvement in formal institutions, the role of informal institutions will shrink (Cao et al, 2016). This seems to have been reflected in China.…”