2017
DOI: 10.1002/pam.22011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Regulating For‐profit Colleges Improve Educational Outcomes? Response to Cellini and Koedel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One audit study found no differences in getting a job interview between someone with a high school degree and someone who attended a for-profit institution (Darolia et al 2015). For-profit colleges practice unethical recruiting, target vulnerable populations such as racial minorities and people with low incomes (Dougherty et al 2016;Lahr et al 2014), provide low-quality education, produce lower graduation rates, saddle students with more student debt, and offer fewer job prospects than their peer institutions (Cellini and Koedel 2017;Gilpin and Stoddard 2017;Lynch, Engle, and Cruz 2010;Schade 2014). Because for-profit schools are part of the bottom of the avalanche, there can be no more displacement into a lower category.…”
Section: The Anti-affirmative Action Avalanchementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One audit study found no differences in getting a job interview between someone with a high school degree and someone who attended a for-profit institution (Darolia et al 2015). For-profit colleges practice unethical recruiting, target vulnerable populations such as racial minorities and people with low incomes (Dougherty et al 2016;Lahr et al 2014), provide low-quality education, produce lower graduation rates, saddle students with more student debt, and offer fewer job prospects than their peer institutions (Cellini and Koedel 2017;Gilpin and Stoddard 2017;Lynch, Engle, and Cruz 2010;Schade 2014). Because for-profit schools are part of the bottom of the avalanche, there can be no more displacement into a lower category.…”
Section: The Anti-affirmative Action Avalanchementioning
confidence: 99%