1999
DOI: 10.2190/f5mt-rtyh-7xr1-tfqu
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Public and Private Religiosity Have a Moderating Effect on Depression? a Bi-Racial Study of Elders in the American South

Abstract: Religious activities are shown to correlate with rates of psychological depression symptoms in a sample of 995 African American and white elderly residents of Nashville. The data, collected in face-to-face interviews, included indicators of both public and private religiosity. Levels of religiosity and perceived social support were higher among the African-American respondents than among others, and among female respondents. Separate regression analyses of the racial groupings, which appeared to have distincti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researchers suggest that religious involvement may be associated with lower depression rates by means of the encouragement of coping strategies through spiritual, intellectual, and social avenues (Husaini, Blasi, & Miller, 1999). Still other researchers have found no such effect in both cross-sectional studies (Courtenay, Poon, Martin, Clayton, & Johnson, 1992;Spendlove, West, & Stanish, 1984) and longitudinal studies (Bosworth, Park, McQuoid, Hays, & Steffens, 2003;Braam, Beekman, Deeg, Smit, & van Tilburg, 1997).…”
Section: Nih-pa Author Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers suggest that religious involvement may be associated with lower depression rates by means of the encouragement of coping strategies through spiritual, intellectual, and social avenues (Husaini, Blasi, & Miller, 1999). Still other researchers have found no such effect in both cross-sectional studies (Courtenay, Poon, Martin, Clayton, & Johnson, 1992;Spendlove, West, & Stanish, 1984) and longitudinal studies (Bosworth, Park, McQuoid, Hays, & Steffens, 2003;Braam, Beekman, Deeg, Smit, & van Tilburg, 1997).…”
Section: Nih-pa Author Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 Despi te the psychometri c l i mi tati ons i nherent i n such measures of rel i gi ous i nvol vement, most studi es that have assessed the rel ati onshi p betw een organi zati onal rel i gi ous i nvol vement and depressi on have found a smal l negati ve associ ati on. Of 29 studi es that exami ned the cross-secti onal associ ati on of a measure of organi zati onal rel i gi ous i nvol vement (usual l y si ngl e-i tem measures assessi ng frequency of church attendance), 24 of them 14,17,21,[23][24][25]30,32,37,[51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65] find people involved in a religious organization to have l ow er l evel s of depressi ve symptoms. They al so are l ess l i kel y to be di agnosed w i th depressi ve di sorders or score i n the cl i ni cal range on di chotomi zed measures of depressi on.…”
Section: Organizational Religious Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typi cal l y, such measures have been si ngl e-i tem i ndi cators, [24][25][26]53,58,63,67,71 al though some researchers have empl oyed mul ti -i tem measures w hose rel i abi li ty can be esti mated. 17,54,55,57,61,64 By far, most studi es suggest that pri vate rel i gi ous acti vi ty mai ntai ns a tenuous rel ati onshi p w i th depressi on. M ost studi es fi nd both the zero-order and mul ti vari ate associ ati ons to be smal l , regardl ess of w hether pri vate rel i gi ous acti vi ty i s measured w i th si ngl e-i tem or mul ti -i tem measures.…”
Section: Organizational Religious Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some investigators have argued that the moderating effect on depression by these religious orienting systems could be due, at least in part, to their innate social support character (Ellison et al, 1989). However, when this hypothesis has been tested, the results have not been conclusive (Idler et al, 1992;Braam et al, 1997a;Koenig et al, 1997;Braam et al, 1998;Husaini et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%