2021
DOI: 10.1111/codi.15498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does prophylactic ureteric stenting at the time of colorectal surgery reduce the risk of ureteric injury? A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract: Aim Cystoscopic placement of ureteric stents during colorectal surgery (CRS) may aid in the intraoperative identification of the ureters and thus prevent ureteric injury, but may also be associated with prolonged operating time, increased cost and adverse events. No formal recommendations exist regarding the use of ureteric stents prior to CRS. Our aim was to determine the effect of prophylactic ureteric stent insertion on the risk of ureteric injury among adult patients undergoing CRS. Method A systematic sea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(55 reference statements)
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other authors also recommend the use of a catheter with light at the tip or the use of fluorescence devices with the intravenous injection of methylene blue for better identification of the ureters intraoperatively (BERALDO et al, 2013;SPEICHER et al, 2014). The use of a ureteral catheter during colorectal surgery, especially in laparoscopic access, where palpation of the ureters is not possible, can help in their identification (HIRD et al, 2021;MEROLA et al, 2018;SMITH & KACHNIC, 2017). Despite the ease offered, the procedure was associated with increased surgical time and expenses, as well as adverse events such as the ureteral obstruction and urinary tract infection (BURKS & SANTUCCI, 2014;ELAWDY et al, 2021;HIRD et al, 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors also recommend the use of a catheter with light at the tip or the use of fluorescence devices with the intravenous injection of methylene blue for better identification of the ureters intraoperatively (BERALDO et al, 2013;SPEICHER et al, 2014). The use of a ureteral catheter during colorectal surgery, especially in laparoscopic access, where palpation of the ureters is not possible, can help in their identification (HIRD et al, 2021;MEROLA et al, 2018;SMITH & KACHNIC, 2017). Despite the ease offered, the procedure was associated with increased surgical time and expenses, as well as adverse events such as the ureteral obstruction and urinary tract infection (BURKS & SANTUCCI, 2014;ELAWDY et al, 2021;HIRD et al, 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, prophylactic ureteric stenting was not associated with increased patient morbidity with respect to the studied outcomes. Operating time was significantly longer in the intervention group, which may have significant cost implications [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 23 Ureteral catheterization did not lead to a decrease of iatrogenic UI as expected according to some studies. 16 , 24 Nevertheless, the procedure of catheterization itself could also cause ureteric perforation, urinal bleeding, etc. 17 , 25 Besides, postoperative hematuria, urinary tract infection, prolonged operative time, and hospital stay were commonly reported associating with catheterization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%