2014
DOI: 10.1136/acupmed-2013-010449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Prior Acupuncture Exposure Affect Perception of Blinded Real Or Sham Acupuncture?

Abstract: Acupuncture-naïve and exposed participants both reported different perceptions of real and sham acupuncture using a blindfolded toothpick protocol. This suggests that future trials should carefully monitor participant perceptions of treatments received, even for naïve individuals. Differences between groups further suggest that participants with significant and/or recent exposure to real acupuncture may introduce bias to blinded clinical acupuncture trials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This brings concern to Asian researchers that the study participants will easily distinguish real from placebo acupuncture. The rationale behind such fear is not simple, as studies examining the influence of the participant’s previous experience on detecting placebo acupuncture presented conflicting results [ 37 , 38 ]. The notion that blinding may be hampered if trial participants are fully informed on details of placebo acupuncture, is partly explained in our BI analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This brings concern to Asian researchers that the study participants will easily distinguish real from placebo acupuncture. The rationale behind such fear is not simple, as studies examining the influence of the participant’s previous experience on detecting placebo acupuncture presented conflicting results [ 37 , 38 ]. The notion that blinding may be hampered if trial participants are fully informed on details of placebo acupuncture, is partly explained in our BI analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a systematic review implies that sham acupuncture may have equal therapeutic effect to real acupuncture [ 43 ]. Furthermore, patients with experience of acupuncture treatment can distinguish between real and sham acupuncture [ 44 ], which may introduce bias to acupuncture study. Therefore, sham acupuncture was not used as control in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, participants with any prior acupuncture exposure were excluded because of concerns that prior acupuncture experience could interfere with blinding. 29 However, because of recruitment issues and low concerns regarding patients with few exposures, the study criteria were subsequently modified to allow participants with no acupuncture for the past 6 months. No bias was detected in these participants and all participants were monitored for treatment assignment perceptions.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies suggest that acupuncture-experienced participants might distinguish sham from verum acupuncture more easily, and these studies suggest that such individuals should be excluded from acupuncture trials. 29,34 However, this practice could limit recruitment in areas of the country where acupuncture use is prevalent and could exclude participants who would be most interested in acupuncture. In either case, this issue should be addressed and the criteria should be justified.…”
Section: Inclusion and Exclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation