2014
DOI: 10.1089/sur.2012.165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Primary Closure Increase Surgical Site Infection after Intestinal Stoma Reversal? A Retrospective Cohort Study

Abstract: The risk of SSI in closed incisions is greater than that in open incisions. It is suggested that incisions not be closed primarily in patients undergoing stoma reversal.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gonzalez et al [ 28 ] reported that age, operation time, and cardiac risk factors were found to be independent risk factors for surgical site infection; however, our study did not identify any risk factors, possibly because of the relatively small sample size. More measures should be taken to decrease the incidence of incision infection, including better management of T2DM, purse-string skin closure, an open incision, and a large surgeon volume[ 26 , 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gonzalez et al [ 28 ] reported that age, operation time, and cardiac risk factors were found to be independent risk factors for surgical site infection; however, our study did not identify any risk factors, possibly because of the relatively small sample size. More measures should be taken to decrease the incidence of incision infection, including better management of T2DM, purse-string skin closure, an open incision, and a large surgeon volume[ 26 , 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was observed in most previous studies. 10,12,13 Vermulst et al found 36% versus 5% infection in primary versus secondary skin wound closure after stoma closure. 13 Secondary closure technique is used in treating wounds in contaminated conditions and has shown to reduce the frequency of infection, wound dehiscence, and hernia formation along with reduction in overall LOS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a wide variation in wound infection rates among different techniques in literature. 3,7 Some studies show increased wound infection rates with primary closure, 10,12,13 others reveal increased rates with secondary closure, 8,11 while a few show no significant difference of infection rates between primary and secondary closures. A few studies favoured purse string closure with reduced infection rates.…”
Section: P R O V I S I O N a L L Ymentioning
confidence: 99%