Does Predisposition Toward Disgust Affect Emotional Response to Political Leaders? Evidence from the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election

Abstract

Objective. We explore the effects of trait disgust sensitivity and induced disgust on emotional response to political leaders. We assert that disgust sensitivity, especially in response to pathogenbased stimuli (e.g., insects, feces, and vomit), will affect an individual's interaction with his or her political environment, including political leaders. Methods. We analyze the effect of individual predispositions in response to stimuli indicating the presence of pathogens on emotional response to President Barack Obama, as well as his Republican challenger during the 2012 election, Mitt Romney. Study 1 utilizes cross-sectional data to determine how disgust sensitivity relates to how President Obama made respondents feel. Study 2 analyzes experimental data considering the effect of a disgusting odorant (butyric acid) on emotional response to Obama and Romney. Results. Findings suggest disgust plays an important role in emotional response to political leaders both through trait sensitivity and when induced and it is particularly relevant to emotional responses to President Obama. Conclusions. Disgust, both as a trait sensitivity and as experimentally induced by an odorant, influences emotional response to the political environment, including high-profile political leaders.

Emotional response to U.K. political party leader facial displays of affiliation, reward, and ambiguity during Brexit

“…Whereas the U.S. political system is a two‐party system marked by competition to the point of sharp polarization during elections and now in governing (Mason 2018; Stewart, George, and Adams 2019), the U.K. parliamentary system can find party collaboration in governance. Thus, differences in follower emotional response, whether positive (happiness and affinity) or negative (anger and distress), may reflect proximity—or lack thereof—to leaders of opposition parties and to the possibility, even likelihood, of collaboration.…”

Yikes! The Effect of Incidental Disgust and Information on Public Attitudes During the COVID‐19 Pandemic

“…Finally, there is conflicting evidence in the literature about whether there is an asymmetry in negativity, and in particular disgust, bias across the ideological spectrum. A wealth of literature suggests that conservatives are more threat‐ and disgust‐sensitive than liberals using physiological (Oxley et al, 2008 ) as well as self‐report measures (Inbar et al, 2012 ; Stewart et al, 2019 ). In contrast, Steiger et al ( 2019 ) report that liberals show greater contempt, anger, disgust, and happiness biases than conservatives.…”