1993
DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90631-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does prediction of outcome alter patient management?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
5

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
49
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially in patients with moderately elevated SAPS II scores, the additional determination of MRproANP markedly improves risk stratification. Prompt risk stratification has been shown to influence patient management, decrease costs and potentially improve clinical outcome [57][58][59][60]. However, clinical impact and costs, particularly with regard to new biomarkers, need to be addressed in future studies.…”
Section: Combination Of Mr-proanp Pct and Icu Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially in patients with moderately elevated SAPS II scores, the additional determination of MRproANP markedly improves risk stratification. Prompt risk stratification has been shown to influence patient management, decrease costs and potentially improve clinical outcome [57][58][59][60]. However, clinical impact and costs, particularly with regard to new biomarkers, need to be addressed in future studies.…”
Section: Combination Of Mr-proanp Pct and Icu Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In additional to, we think that the predictor models have to be used only informing to patients and their relationships, understanding of HI severity and never make a negative effect on patients' treatment (20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a truism supported by evidence that prognosis is the cornerstone of medical decision-making [3]. Nowhere is this maxim more apparent than in the patient with a devastating brain injury.…”
Section: Improving Prognostic Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%