Abstract:Praising is considered to have a positive effect on learners’ motivations. Yet, what to praise and how to praise is an issue of controversy. The present study looks at the effect of praising ESL learners’ writing efforts in English as opposed to evaluating their writing abilities in order to test Dweck (2007) theory of praising intelligence or effort. The investigation is based on a set of language parameters used in conventional evaluation of ESL writing pieces.Forty adult English L2 learners at the women’s C… Show more
While a plethora of studies have been conducted on corrective feedback in L2 writing, praise as feedback has received less attention in L2 writing despite its well-acknowledged motivating functions in education and psychology (For economy of expression, the word “praise” will be used consistently throughout this paper to denote “praise as feedback”). To fill this gap, this review article aims to provide a bird's eye view of praise in L2 writing. This paper reports praise givers’ perceptions and practices, praise receivers’ perceptions and the effect of praise from reviewed studies. Specifically, this paper highlights the issue of ill-defined praise in L2 writing, the mismatch between teachers’ positive perceptions and their practices, inconsistent findings regarding the effectiveness of praise as well as motivating functions of praise. Based on these findings, this article argues that more attention should be given to unleashing the potential of praise through teachers’ giving balanced and quality praise and more investigations of praise with longitudinal research design and multiple data sources so as to advance our understandings of feedback in student L2 writing development.
While a plethora of studies have been conducted on corrective feedback in L2 writing, praise as feedback has received less attention in L2 writing despite its well-acknowledged motivating functions in education and psychology (For economy of expression, the word “praise” will be used consistently throughout this paper to denote “praise as feedback”). To fill this gap, this review article aims to provide a bird's eye view of praise in L2 writing. This paper reports praise givers’ perceptions and practices, praise receivers’ perceptions and the effect of praise from reviewed studies. Specifically, this paper highlights the issue of ill-defined praise in L2 writing, the mismatch between teachers’ positive perceptions and their practices, inconsistent findings regarding the effectiveness of praise as well as motivating functions of praise. Based on these findings, this article argues that more attention should be given to unleashing the potential of praise through teachers’ giving balanced and quality praise and more investigations of praise with longitudinal research design and multiple data sources so as to advance our understandings of feedback in student L2 writing development.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.