2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does poor health predict moving, move quality, and desire to move?: A study examining neighborhood selection in US adolescents and adults

Abstract: Background To date, very little research has considered the role of health on shaping characteristics of the neighborhood, including mobility patterns. We explored whether individual health status is one of the characteristics that shape and constrain where individuals live. Methods Using data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, we examined whether 16 health indicators (e.g., health behaviors, symptoms, overall status) predicted moving, move quality, and desire to move. Results 3.8% … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier studies that adjusted for stated neighborhood preferences (Frank et al, 2007) to assess health-related selection effects are now joined by new empirical evidence supporting (M. C. Arcaya et al, 2014; Dunn et al, 2014) (Arcaya et al, 2015) and disputing (James et al, 2015) the idea that health is a meaningful neighborhood selection factor. Clarifying the casual role of health status in determining residential outcomes is important for both generating unbiased neighborhood effects on health estimates and for understanding the substantively important process that determine residential mobility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier studies that adjusted for stated neighborhood preferences (Frank et al, 2007) to assess health-related selection effects are now joined by new empirical evidence supporting (M. C. Arcaya et al, 2014; Dunn et al, 2014) (Arcaya et al, 2015) and disputing (James et al, 2015) the idea that health is a meaningful neighborhood selection factor. Clarifying the casual role of health status in determining residential outcomes is important for both generating unbiased neighborhood effects on health estimates and for understanding the substantively important process that determine residential mobility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Designating health as an outcome and neighborhood characteristics as exposures, although key to informing equitable and health-promoting policies (14), is so pervasive that reverse causation and endogeneity are largely relegated to a single nuisance category of "selection." Selection has been subject to ample theoretical attention (8,(14)(15)(16) and empirical scrutiny as a source of bias in neighborhood-effects estimates (17)(18)(19), but it is rarely (20,21) viewed as an outcome of interest in its own right in the context of understanding neighborhood-health interactions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One caveat is that response may be related to a change such as moving address, which in turn is related to, for example, age and socioeconomic factors. 12 , 13 …”
Section: How Often Have They Been Followed Up?mentioning
confidence: 99%