2023
DOI: 10.1108/tqm-10-2022-0297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does pickup service quality explain buy online pickup in-store service user's citizenship behavior? Moderating role of product categories and gender

Abstract: PurposeBuilding on stimulus organism response theory, the current study examines the influence of pickup service quality of buy online, pickup in-store (BOPIS) service on the BOPIS users' satisfaction, trust and commitment, subsequently leading to customer citizenship behavior (CCB). It examines the proposed relationships against boundary conditions, product categories and gender.Design/methodology/approachThe research is descriptive, quantitative and cross-sectional investigation. It was conducted using data … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(229 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, given that an integrated store differs from a conventional brick-and-mortar store examining the in-store servicescape quality-driven customer attachment and subsequent store beneficial behaviors has become imperative (Zhang et al , 2022). Our research answers this gap and differs significantly from the recent studies that have focused on the store attachment to model outcome variables like citizenship behavior Natarajan et al (2023c) (Gorji et al , 2021), word-of-mouth behaviors (Horáková et al , 2022; Rodrigues and Brandão, 2021) and retailer switching intentions (Horáková et al , 2022), but we have relied on this theoretical lens to demonstrate the positive impact of store attachment on store beneficial behaviors like (willingness to pay more, cross-buying behaviors and webrooming intentions) of omnichannel customers at the interface of online and offline-integrated store context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Third, given that an integrated store differs from a conventional brick-and-mortar store examining the in-store servicescape quality-driven customer attachment and subsequent store beneficial behaviors has become imperative (Zhang et al , 2022). Our research answers this gap and differs significantly from the recent studies that have focused on the store attachment to model outcome variables like citizenship behavior Natarajan et al (2023c) (Gorji et al , 2021), word-of-mouth behaviors (Horáková et al , 2022; Rodrigues and Brandão, 2021) and retailer switching intentions (Horáková et al , 2022), but we have relied on this theoretical lens to demonstrate the positive impact of store attachment on store beneficial behaviors like (willingness to pay more, cross-buying behaviors and webrooming intentions) of omnichannel customers at the interface of online and offline-integrated store context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Retailers must ensure prompt product availability when a customer enters the store and maintain a diversified product range because, as this research shows, engaged customers with a strong sense of attachment to a store are willing to make additional purchases there. Natarajan and Veer Raghavan (2023d) Store managers could invest in interesting in-store technologies that foster CE. For instance, digital signage lets retailers display dynamic, interactive content that catches customers’ attention, which could be used to provide product information and suggestions, making the shopping experience more engaging and informative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moser (2021) stressed that deep customer knowledge represents a relevant prerequisite for successful CRM systems. As customers engage with brands across multiple platforms in digital and physical worlds, managing the current omnichannel business ecosystem becomes increasingly complex (Natarajan and Veera Raghavan, 2023). On the one hand, as emerged in our case study, automotive firms still need insights developed by dealerships thanks to their direct interactions with customers in physical stores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the research objectives, Yi and Gong (2013) suggest that either of these two dimensions may be employed independently. Several researchers including Lee et al (2019), Manzoor et al (2021), Natarajan et al (2023), Ma et al (2023), and Yang et al (2023), considered the CZB dimension only, whereas Ahn, Lee, and Kwon (2020) and Min et al (2021) argued that CPB leads to CZB. Mai et al (2020) explain the VCCB using four dimensions, namely dialogue, access, risk, and transparency (popularly called the DART model).…”
Section: Ado Framework‐based Review Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%