Does physician communication style impact patient report of decision quality for breast cancer treatment?

Abstract

Objective Provider communication that supports patient autonomy has been associated with numerous positive patient outcomes. However, to date, no research has examined the relationship between perceived provider communication style and patient-assessed decision quality in breast cancer. Methods Using a population-based sample of women with localized breast cancer, we assessed patient perceptions of autonomy-supportive communication from their surgeons and medical oncologists, as well as patient-reported decision quality. We used multivariable linear regression to examine the association between autonomy-supportive communication and subjective decision quality for surgery and chemotherapy decisions, controlling for sociodemographic and clinical factors, as well as patient-reported communication preference (non-directive or directive). Results Among the 1,690 women included in the overall sample, patient-reported decision quality scores were positively associated with higher levels of perceived autonomy-supportive communication from surgeons (β=0.30; p<0.001) and medical oncologists (β=0.26; p<0.001). Patient communication style preference moderated the association between physician communication style received and perceived decision quality. Conclusion Autonomy-supportive communication by physicians was associated with higher subjective decision quality among women with localized breast cancer. These results support future efforts to design interventions that enhance autonomy-supportive communication. Practice Implications Autonomy-supportive communication by cancer doctors can improve patients’ perceived decision quality.

Characteristics of therapeutic alliance in musculoskeletal physiotherapy and occupational therapy practice: a scoping review of the literature

“…Studies in medicine show that TA influences chronic disease care [13], improves adherence, satisfaction and quality of life [14], enhances communication [15, 16] and impacts decision quality [17]. This is opposed to recent interest in allied health disciplines like physiotherapy (PT) [20, 21] and occupational therapy (OT) [22].…”

Understanding the engagement of key decision support persons in patient decision making around breast cancer treatment

“…Deliberation was measured with a 4‐item scale developed from a public deliberation scale assessing the degree to which patients thought through their treatment‐related decisions. In agreement with prior studies, both measures were dichotomized with high and low cut points; an overall SDQ score higher than 4 indicated greater SDQ, and an overall deliberation score higher than 4 indicated a more deliberative decision …”

“…In agreement with prior studies, both measures were dichotomized with high and low cut points; an overall SDQ score higher than 4 indicated greater SDQ, 7,22 and an overall deliberation score higher than 4 indicated a more deliberative decision. 23…”

The association between patient attitudes and values and the strength of consideration for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in a population‐based sample of breast cancer patients

“…Patients were asked to indicate the degree to which they wanted their physician to tell them what to do and the degree to which they preferred to make their own breast cancer treatment decisions. Each item was scored on a 5‐point scale ranging from not at all to all the time, and each was categorized as quite a bit/all the time or less …”