2009
DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Open Stone Surgery Still Play a Role in the Treatment of Urolithiasis? Data of a Primary Urolithiasis Center

Abstract: Although today most stone cases can be handled by minimally invasive treatment, open stone surgery maintains a mandatory role in very selected cases. The most common indication in our series though was complex stones with a high stone burden especially in combination with anatomical variations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
39
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[26] In open surgery stone-free rate has been reported to range between 69, and 93 percent. [23,27] In our study, stone-free rate of 69.3% was detected in 13 patients. However, complex stone burden which is one of the indications of open surgery, inadequacy of other minimally invasive methods, presence of anatomical abnormalities or comorbidies all decrease stone-free rates in this group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[26] In open surgery stone-free rate has been reported to range between 69, and 93 percent. [23,27] In our study, stone-free rate of 69.3% was detected in 13 patients. However, complex stone burden which is one of the indications of open surgery, inadequacy of other minimally invasive methods, presence of anatomical abnormalities or comorbidies all decrease stone-free rates in this group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…[23,24] In recent years, though its field of application has narrowed, concurrent open stone surgery has been performed in cases with comorbidities as complicated stone burden,ureteropelvic junction stenosis, infundibular narrowing, and calyceal diverticula, morbid obesity or inadequacy of minimally invasive therapies in the management of stone disease. [3,[24][25][26] Open stone surgery is not recommended directly in international guidelines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to developments in PNL, and URS, in major stone treatment centers, open stone surgery may be required only in 1-5.4% of the cases. [3,[12][13][14] PNL has opened a new era in the treatment of stone disease, and it has become a treatment alternative currently applicable for all renal stones with its advantages including higher treatment success, rates, shorter hospital stay, early return to one's work after the intervention, shorter surgical incision, and almost lack of postoperative scar tissue. In the presence of intractable bleeding diathesis, pregnancy, active urinary tract infection or ortopedic deformity which will restrict appropriate required positioning of the patient PNL procedure is contraindicated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCNL is now the preferred treatment for patients with renal calculi and is a safe and successful method used for removal of different types of stones 3 . The technique is also being used increasingly for smaller stones that have failed Extra Corporeal Shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) or where in the anatomy of the collecting system would likely result in a lesser chance of success with ESWL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%