Does one bad apple ruin a firm’s green brand image? Examining frontline service employees’ environmentally irresponsible behaviors

Abstract

Purpose Drawing on the branded service encounters perspective, the purpose of this study is to investigate how frontline service employees’ environmentally irresponsible behaviors affect customers’ brand evaluations. Design/methodology/approach The research conducted two experiments. The first experiment explored the effect of frontline service employees’ environmentally irresponsible behaviors on customers’ brand evaluations via corporate hypocrisy. The second experiment explored the moderation effect of employees’ prototypicality and the importance of corporate social responsibility (CSR) among customers. Findings Experiment 1 indicates that for firms with a green brand image, frontline employees’ environmentally irresponsible behaviors result in customers’ perception that the firm is hypocritical, thus reducing their brand evaluations. Experiment 2 shows that employee prototypicality and CSR importance to the customer enhance the negative impact of frontline employees’ environmentally irresponsible behaviors on customers’ brand evaluations through customers’ perception of corporate hypocrisy. Research limitations/implications This study is one of the first efforts to explore how frontline service employees’ environmentally irresponsible behaviors affect customers’ responses. It helps understand the impact of frontline employees’ counter-productive sustainable behaviors on customers’ brand perception, as well as the relationship between CSR and employees. Practical implications This study suggests that firms’ green brand image does not always lead to positive customer response. When frontline employees’ behaviors are inconsistent with firms’ green brand image, it can trigger customers’ perceptions of corporate hypocrisy and thus influence their brand evaluations. Therefore, firms should train frontline service employees to make their behaviors align with the firms’ green brand image. Originality/value This study is one of the first efforts to explore how frontline service employees’ environmentally irresponsible behaviors affect customers’ responses. It helps understand the impact of frontline employees’ counter-productive sustainable behaviors on customers’ brand perception, as well as the relationship between CSR and employee.

Antecedents and consequences of fast-food restaurant customers' perception of price fairness

“…These findings also align with the findings gained from separate published studies of various construct interrelationships derived from disparate business sectors in developed economies and suggest that results could be generalizable. This study and other disparate studies both independently established the positive influence of service quality on customer perceived PF (Han and Ryu, 2009;Jani and Han, 2011;Jeaheng et al, 2020), and that BI positively strengthened the interrelationship between the service quality and customer perceived PF (Anselmsson et al, 2014;Saleh et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2020). Comparable findings in this study and research from other contexts also established the direct effect of PF on CS (Batsakis et al, 2019;Jin et al, 2012) and PF (Manosuthi and Han, 2020) and CS (Byun and Jang, 2019;Kim et al, 2020) on CR.…”

Customer reactions to bank hypocrisy: the moderating role of customer–company identification and brand equity

“…Corporate hypocrisy was measured with five items derived from Hur et al (2016) and Wagner et al 's (2009) scale, which has frequently been used in past studies (e.g. Arli et al , 2017; Losada-Otálora and Alkire, 2019; Miao and Zhou, 2020; Zhang et al , 2020). In line with the study by Hur et al .…”

How do ESG pillars impact firms’ marketing performance? A configurational analysis in the pharmaceutical sector

“…Successful employment of this tool might help companies build a competitive advantage and lead to an enhancement of their marketing performance (Vorhies and Morgan, 2005). However, in the literature, there has been less attention on CSR and marketing performance (Chahal and Sharma, 2006; Du et al , 2010; Maignan et al , 2005; Chernev and Blair, 2015; Rahman et al , 2017; Shea and Hawn, 2019; Zhang et al , 2020). From a marketing perspective, CSR activities may achieve the following: reduce costs and provide benefits similar to those of an advertising campaign; create a reputation for the company as honest and reliable (McWilliams and Siegel, 2001); and enhance the purchase intention of potential customers (Fagerstrøm et al , 2015).…”