2001
DOI: 10.1353/wp.2001.0011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Oil Hinder Democracy?

Abstract: Some scholars suggest that the Middle East's oil wealth helps explain its failure to democratize. This article examines three aspects of this “oil impedes democracy” claim. First, is it true? Does oil have a consistendy antidemocratic effect on states, once other factors are accounted for? Second, can this claim be generalized? Is it true only in the Middle East or elsewhere as well? Is it true for other types of mineral wealth and other types of commodity wealth or only for oil? Finally, if oil does have anti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

51
1,229
5
63

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,183 publications
(1,348 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
51
1,229
5
63
Order By: Relevance
“…One panel study investigating the link between resources, institutional development and growth in 91 developing countries during 1970-2000 finds that point-source type natural resources (minerals, coffee, coca) retard democratic and institutional development, measured by the degree of democracy for each country over time, and this stunts growth (Mavrotas, et. al., 2006; also see Ross, 1999Ross, , 2001b. Another panel data study finds that the impact of resources on growth found in cross-country regressions disappears once one allows for fixed effects; resource dependence (primary exports as fraction of GNP) may be correlated with unobservable characteristics (Manzano and Rigobon, 2001).…”
Section: Empirical Evidence For Negative Effect Of Natural Resources mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One panel study investigating the link between resources, institutional development and growth in 91 developing countries during 1970-2000 finds that point-source type natural resources (minerals, coffee, coca) retard democratic and institutional development, measured by the degree of democracy for each country over time, and this stunts growth (Mavrotas, et. al., 2006; also see Ross, 1999Ross, , 2001b. Another panel data study finds that the impact of resources on growth found in cross-country regressions disappears once one allows for fixed effects; resource dependence (primary exports as fraction of GNP) may be correlated with unobservable characteristics (Manzano and Rigobon, 2001).…”
Section: Empirical Evidence For Negative Effect Of Natural Resources mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, determining the exact number of street children is impossible according to the estimates released by the UNICEF, but such figures approximately reach to about tens of millions children throughout the world [2]. The age range of these children in developing countries falls under 8 years, although in developed countries the range is above 12 years [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is so, because oil is another non-taxed source of revenue and has a huge positive impact on the survival of authoritarian regimes. 16 Iraq is also not considered acceptable for the sample because of the direct influence that Western countries have there. Syria is not taken into account because of its close ties with a non-democratic Russia and financial data for transactions between these two states is not included in the dataset used for analysis.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%