Abstract:Mucosal remodeling in the sinuses is a recently described phenomenon in which the mucosa undergoes potentially irreversible changes as a result of ongoing underlying inflammatory processes. Research into remodeling that occurs in the bronchial airways in asthmatic patients has led to modification of asthma treatment guidelines. However, remodeling in the sinuses has still not led to changes in current medical or surgical management of chronic rhinosinusitis. Upper airway remodeling constitutes a new area of re… Show more
“…Increased surgery could lead to, or be the consequence of, mucosal remodeling. Indeed, such patients may have developed "dysfunctional" frontal sinuses as suggested by Bassiouni et al 17 Our findings regarding AERD are in keeping with Georgalas et al, 11 but in contrast to Tran et al 16 and Schlosser et al, 18 who found no association between AERD and failure of the EMLP in cohorts of 44 and 77 patients, respectively. The association of AERD with failure may be related to the more aggressive recurrence of polyps in this specific cohort.…”
The failure rate of revision EMLP is 21% in our series. The majority of revisions were for nasal polyp recurrence. Revision EMLP is a safe and well-tolerated procedure in the small group of patients that require further surgery. Patients with intraoperative pus present at their initial EMLP, more than 5 previous sinus operations, or AERD are at increased risk of failure.
“…Increased surgery could lead to, or be the consequence of, mucosal remodeling. Indeed, such patients may have developed "dysfunctional" frontal sinuses as suggested by Bassiouni et al 17 Our findings regarding AERD are in keeping with Georgalas et al, 11 but in contrast to Tran et al 16 and Schlosser et al, 18 who found no association between AERD and failure of the EMLP in cohorts of 44 and 77 patients, respectively. The association of AERD with failure may be related to the more aggressive recurrence of polyps in this specific cohort.…”
The failure rate of revision EMLP is 21% in our series. The majority of revisions were for nasal polyp recurrence. Revision EMLP is a safe and well-tolerated procedure in the small group of patients that require further surgery. Patients with intraoperative pus present at their initial EMLP, more than 5 previous sinus operations, or AERD are at increased risk of failure.
“…Another hypothesis as to why the EMLP is successful in resolving persistent symptoms of CRS is supported by two recently published literature reviews into the failure of ESS, which dealt with the concept of inflammatory load and mucosal remodeling . Intraoperatively, the EMLP allows the majority of the frontal sinus to be accessed, with removal of polypoid mucosa and eosinophilic mucous.…”
This is the single largest study of EMLP in the literature with a long follow-up period. It illustrates the benefit of the EMLP for patients with CRS recalcitrant to medical and standard endoscopic sinus surgery.
“…839,840 Sinonasal mucosal remodeling, at times irreversible, can occur. 841,842 The varied medical therapies aimed at treatment of CRSsNP, including antibiotics and systemic corticosteroids, can also cause serious complications and add morbidity to the disease. [843][844][845][846][847] VIII.…”
Background:The body of knowledge regarding rhinosinusitis (RS) continues to expand, with rapid growth in number of publications, yet substantial variability in the quality of those presentations. In an effort to both consolidate and critically appraise this information, rhinologic experts from around the world have produced the International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis (ICAR:RS).
Methods:Evidence-based reviews with recommendations (EBRRs) were developed for scores of topics, using previously reported methodology. Where existing evidence was insufficient for an EBRR, an evidence-based review (EBR) was produced. The sections were then synthesized and the entire manuscript was then reviewed by all authors for consensus.
Results:The resulting ICAR:RS document addresses multiple topics in RS, including acute RS (ARS), chronic RS (CRS) with and without nasal polyps (CRSwNP and CRSsNP), recurrent acute RS (RARS), acute exacerbation of CRS (AE-CRS), and pediatric RS.
Conclusion:As a critical review of the RS literature, ICAR:RS provides a thorough review of pathophysiology and evidence-based recommendations for medical and surgical treatment. It also demonstrates the significant gaps in our understanding of the pathophysiology and optimal management of RS. Too o en the foundation upon which these recommendations are based is comprised of lowerlevel evidence. It is our hope that this summary of the evidence in RS will point out where additional research efforts may be directed. C 2016 ARS-AAOA, LLC.
Key Words:rhinosinusitis; chronic rhinosinusitis; acute rhinosinusitis; recurrent acute rhinosinusitis; evidence-based medicine; systematic review; endoscopic sinus surgery
List of Abbreviations Used
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.