Does motivation matter? – The relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy and enthusiasm and students’ performance

Abstract

Knowledge and motivation of a teacher are two unchallenged, essential characteristics for successful education. Whilst the relevance of teachers’ professional knowledge for successful students’ learning has been studied in a sophisticated manner for years, the meaning of teachers’ motivational orientations for students’ performance still lacks a differentiated consideration. This construct is conceptualized by three domains: (1) self-efficacy, (2) subject-specific enthusiasm, and (3) enthusiasm for teaching the subject. Motivational orientations overall have shown to be relevant predictors of students’ learning. However, there are several dimensions of motivation and their relative importance remains unclear. Our study goes beyond the available findings by considering in detail each of the three domains’ relations to students’ performance. Thus, we aim to further contribute to the clarification of the predictors of students’ performance in school teaching. For this purpose, we conducted a study with 48 biology teachers and their 1036 students. To assess the three domains of teachers’ motivational orientations, we applied paper and pencil tests. Concept maps and paper and pencil tests were used to measure students’ performance. By specifying multilevel structural equation models, we examined the relationship between the domains of teachers’ motivational orientations and the performance of the students. Our results reveal no relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy and students’ performance, but a significant positive relationship between the latter and teachers’ subject-specific enthusiasm. Moreover, our results show a positive trend in the relationship between enthusiasm for teaching the subject and students’ performance. The results provide a differentiated picture about the importance of motivational orientations for the characterisation of an effective teacher. We discuss our findings in terms of possible effect mechanisms and their relevance for further research on teacher motivation and the improvement of teacher education programmes.

More isn't always better: The curvilinear relationship between inquiry-based teaching and student achievement in science

“…A mounting body of evidence demonstrates the relevance of teachers' self-efficacy to their instructional behaviors (see review by Mansour, 2009;. In particular, teachers with a high sense of self-efficacy are more likely to develop challenging lessons, provide more autonomy for student learning (Tschannen-Moran et al, 1998;Sandholtz and Ringstaff, 2014), experiment with new instructional strategies, and try different teaching materials compared to teachers with lower self-efficacy (McKinnon and Lamberts, 2014). They also show greater commitment to improving their teaching and are more persistent in working with challenging students (Tschannen-Moran et al, 1998;Sandholtz and Ringstaff, 2014).…”

The Effect of Emotional Intelligence, Self-Efficacy, Subjective Well-Being and Resilience on Student Teachers’ Perceived Practicum Stress: A Malaysian Case Study

“…According to Qureshi (2015), the interaction of cognitive (personal factors), behavioral factors and environmental factors shape the individual's action. Knowledge, expectation and attitude are cognitive factors whereas environmental factors relate to social norms, community access and influence on other people (Mahler et al, 2018).…”

Physiology education for intensive care medicine residents: A 15-minute interactive peer-led flipped classroom session

“…Indeed, a teacher's ability to teach, his/her interpersonal skills, and his/her personal/professional abilities may influence learners' preference for that teacher [55]. Moreover, the subject-specific enthusiasm teachers convey may directly relate to learners' performance [56]. Finally, the interaction between teachers themselves, as well as between learners, and the organisation may influence motivation [57].…”