2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00262.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Morality Policy Exist? Testing a Basic Assumption

Abstract: Does morality policy exist? A growing body of scholarship has examined the ways that the politics of so‐called “morality policy” (e.g., abortion regulation, same‐sex marriage policy, and capital punishment) differ from the politics of other types of policy. In this literature, morality policies are assumed to be distinctive in that they generate conflicts of basic moral values, do not lend themselves to compromise, and are widely salient and technically simple. Using an email survey of morality policy scholars… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
94
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
94
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Morality policies have several distinct characteristics. They are relatively easy for the majority of citizens to understand, salient to the public, and are characterized by strong moral reactions from citizens (e.g., Mooney & Schuldt, 2008). Given these characteristics, scholars have sought to explain policy differences-often focusing on public opinion-across the states.…”
Section: Morality Issues: the Death Penalty And Abortionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morality policies have several distinct characteristics. They are relatively easy for the majority of citizens to understand, salient to the public, and are characterized by strong moral reactions from citizens (e.g., Mooney & Schuldt, 2008). Given these characteristics, scholars have sought to explain policy differences-often focusing on public opinion-across the states.…”
Section: Morality Issues: the Death Penalty And Abortionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been considerable debate about whether morality policy exists as a discernible category of policy, and if so, how to identify it (Smith 1969;1975;Tatalovich and Daynes 2011;Wald et al 2001;Mooney and Schuldt 2008;Roh and Berry 2008;Studlar 2008;Mucciaroni 2011;Knill 2013;Ryan 2014). The prevalent tendency in previous research, especially in the U.S. (Donovan et al 2015), is to argue that morality policy is defined by process as well as by content.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, however, the potential effects of religion on public policy outputs have been increasingly debated in the literature. This holds true in particular for socalled morality policies; by virtue of their subject areas, these policies are closely related to societal value conflicts, and therefore also to conflicts between religious and secular values (Asal et al 2013;Engeli et al 2012a;Fink 2008;Knill 2013;Mooney 1999;Mooney and Schuldt 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%