2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2006.13178
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Matter Matter? Using the mass distribution to distinguish neutron stars and black holes

Maya Fishbach,
Reed Essick,
Daniel E. Holz

Abstract: Gravitational-wave detectors have opened a new window through which we can observe black holes (BH) and neutron stars (NS). Analyzing the 11 detections from LIGO/Virgo's first gravitationalwave catalog, GWTC-1, we investigate whether the power-law fit to the BH mass spectrum can also accommodate the binary neutron star event GW170817, or whether we require an additional feature in the power-law between the NS and BH populations. The presence and location of a feature between NS and BH has implications for the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we find that if the black hole mass spectrum extends down to 3 M , it likely turns over at ∼ 7.8 +2.2 −2.1 M . This suggests that there may be a dearth of systems between NS and black hole masses (Fishbach et al 2020a). However, the O3a observation of GW190814 (Abbott et al 2020c), with a secondary mass m 2 = 2.59 +0.08 −0.09 M , complicates this picture.…”
Section: What Is the Minimum Black Hole Mass? Usingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we find that if the black hole mass spectrum extends down to 3 M , it likely turns over at ∼ 7.8 +2.2 −2.1 M . This suggests that there may be a dearth of systems between NS and black hole masses (Fishbach et al 2020a). However, the O3a observation of GW190814 (Abbott et al 2020c), with a secondary mass m 2 = 2.59 +0.08 −0.09 M , complicates this picture.…”
Section: What Is the Minimum Black Hole Mass? Usingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Already several interesting proposals have been made (see, e.g., Abbott et al 2020;Most et al 2020;Fishbach et al 2020;Tan et al 2020;Lehmann et al 2020;Vattis et al 2020;Essick & Landry 2020;Zevin et al 2020;Safarzadeh & Loeb 2020;Sedrakian et al 2020). Since it is well known that rotations provide additional support to the pressure balancing the gravity, leading to a NS maximum mass at the Kepler frequency about 20% higher than that of the static NS for a given nuclear Equation of State (EOS) (see, e.g., Cook et al 1994;Lasota et al 1996;Lattimer & Prakash 2004;Krastev et al 2008a;Haensel et al 2008Haensel et al , 2009Breu & Rezzolla 2016;Wei et al 2017), the possibility for the GW190814's secondary as a rapidly rotating NS was first studied by the LIGO/Virgo Collaboration (Abbott et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming that BH and NS mass distributions do not overlap, it might be ex-tracted from population studies or observations of BHs, e.g., Refs. [8][9][10], or from nuclear-physics considerations, e.g., Refs. [11,12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%