2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-15655-8_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Mathematics Need Foundations?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of these differences are too nuanced to be exposed here. For instance, while the later Wittgenstein's philosophy of mathematics has usually been characterized as antifoundationalist (Floyd 2021, p. 1;Grève and Mühlhölzer 2014;Rodych 1999), some suggesting this trait carries over from his middle phase (Rodych 2018), it has also been proposed that it is plurifoundationalist, while Lakatos deserves the anti-foundationalism label instead (Wagner 2019).…”
Section: Wittgenstein's Late Philosophy Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these differences are too nuanced to be exposed here. For instance, while the later Wittgenstein's philosophy of mathematics has usually been characterized as antifoundationalist (Floyd 2021, p. 1;Grève and Mühlhölzer 2014;Rodych 1999), some suggesting this trait carries over from his middle phase (Rodych 2018), it has also been proposed that it is plurifoundationalist, while Lakatos deserves the anti-foundationalism label instead (Wagner 2019).…”
Section: Wittgenstein's Late Philosophy Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%