Does macroeconomic uncertainty really matter in predicting stock market behavior? A comparative study on China and USA

Abstract

PurposeThe study aims to analyze the interaction between macroeconomic uncertainty and stock market return and volatility for China and USA and tries to draw some invaluable inferences for the investors, portfolio managers and policy analysts.Design/methodology/approachEmpirically the study uses GARCH family models to capture the time-varying volatility of stock market and macroeconomic risk factors by using monthly data ranging from 1995:M7 to 2018:M6. Then, these volatility series are further used in the multivariate VAR model to analyze the feedback interaction between stock market and macroeconomic risk factors for China and USA. The study also incorporates the impact of Asian financial crisis of 1997–1998 and the global financial crisis of 2007–2008 by using dummy variables in the GARCH model analysis.FindingsThe empirical results of GARCH models indicate volatility persistence in the stock markets and the macroeconomic variables of both countries. The study finds relatively weak and inconsistent unidirectional causality for China mainly running from the stock market to the macroeconomic variables; however, the volatility spillover transmission reciprocates when the impact of Asian financial crisis and Global financial crisis is incorporated. For USA, the contemporaneous relationship between stock market and macroeconomic risk factors is quite strong and bidirectional both at first and second moment level.Originality/valueThis study investigates the interaction between stock market and macroeconomic uncertainty for China and USA. The researchers believe that none of the prior studies has made such rigorous comparison of two of the big and diverse economies (China and USA) which are quite contrasting in terms of political, economic and social background. Therefore, this study also tries to test the presumed conception that macroeconomic uncertainty in China may have different impact on the stock market return and volatility than in USA.

Study on the linkage between macro policy and market effectiveness in China’s stock market: Based on run test of China’s stock market index

“…Assumption 2: The macro policy of the stock market is equivalent to an important kind of information. The impact of this information on the effectiveness of the stock market can last for a period of time [ 31 ]. During this period, it can be considered that the effectiveness of the market is affected by this information.…”

Causality between Green Stock Market with Monetary Policy, Global Uncertainty, and Environmental Damage in Indonesia

“…While the APT is a development of the average variance model of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) introduced by Treynor, 1961;Sharpe, 1964;Lintner, 1965, which includes the influence of macroeconomic variables to capture systematic risk in predicting stock prices (Yusof and Majid, 2007). In summary, if the market is efficient, then any changes in macroeconomic variables will directly or indirectly affect the expected cash flows of companies and their funding and investment decisions (Abbas and Wang, 2020). Where the relationship of variables in equation ( 1) can be explained as follows: of the regression, ε t is error term, variable SRI is the return from the SRI KEHATI index, PR is the Indonesian policy interest rate (percent), lnWUI is the natural log of the global uncertainty index (weighted average of GDP in dollars), lnECO 2 is the natural log of emissions Indonesia's territorial carbon in million tons of carbon per year (MtC), lnDF is the natural log of Indonesia's deforestation in thousand hectares/ year (ha/year).…”

The impact of COVID-19 on GCC equity and debt markets: Evidence from TVP-VAR estimation

“…The loss in stock markets requires policy interventions from regulators and governments to safeguard the financial system and reduce excessive volatilities [33]. Most of the capital is invested in stock markets, and market returns are highly influenced by macroeconomic news and investors sentiments [34][35][36]. Investors can predict stock returns by considering macroeconomic factors, but this task becomes problematic when a health-based crisis affect financial markets.…”