Does livestock protect from malaria or facilitate malaria prevalence? A cross-sectional study in endemic rural areas of Indonesia

Abstract

BackgroundEver since it was discovered that zoophilic vectors can transmit malaria, zooprophylaxis has been used to prevent the disease. However, zoopotentiation has also been observed. Thus, the presence of livestock has been widely accepted as an important variable for the prevalence and risk of malaria, but the effectiveness of zooprophylaxis remained subject to debate. This study aims to critically analyse the effects of the presence of livestock on malaria prevalence using a large dataset from Indonesia.MethodsThis study is based on data from the Indonesia Basic Health Research (“Riskesdas”) cross-sectional survey of 2007 organized by the National Institute of Health Research and Development of Indonesia’s Ministry of Health. The subset of data used in the present study included 259,885 research participants who reside in the rural areas of 176 regencies throughout the 15 provinces of Indonesia where the prevalence of malaria is higher than the national average. The variable “existence of livestock” and other independent demographic, social and behavioural variables were tested as potential determinants for malaria prevalence by multivariate logistic regressions.ResultsRaising medium-sized animals in the house was a significant predictor of malaria prevalence (OR = 2.980; 95% CI 2.348–3.782, P < 0.001) when compared to keeping such animals outside of the house (OR = 1.713; 95% CI 1.515–1.937, P < 0.001). After adjusting for gender, age, access to community health facility, sewage canal condition, use of mosquito nets and insecticide-treated bed nets, the participants who raised medium-sized animals inside their homes were 2.8 times more likely to contract malaria than respondents who did not (adjusted odds ratio = 2.809; 95% CI 2.207–3.575; P < 0.001).ConclusionsThe results of this study highlight the importance of livestock for malaria transmission, suggesting that keeping livestock in the house contributes to malaria risk rather than prophylaxis in Indonesia. Livestock-based interventions should therefore play a significant role in the implementation of malaria control programmes, and focus on households with a high proportion of medium-sized animals in rural areas. The implementation of a “One Health” strategy to eliminate malaria in Indonesia by 2030 is strongly recommended.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12936-018-2447-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Variation of preventive practices and its association with malaria infection in eastern Indonesia: Findings from community-based survey

“…Women were less likely to be reported in malaria compared to males. These findings were similar to studies elsewhere [19,35,36] and a previous study in Indonesia [37].…”

Pathways linking biodiversity to human health: A conceptual framework

“…human, livestock, rodents, birds). The interactions of these three VBD components attribute to qualitative and quantitative biodiversity, for instance: genotype-specific replication in the vector (Riehle et al, 2006); pathogen transmission to the host (Heitmann et al, 2018); context-dependent host preference (Simpson et al, 2012); differential responses in phenology and distribution (Elyazar et al, 2013;Hasyim et al, 2018); and dynamic pathogen spreading in social networks of host species (Ezenwa et al, 2016).…”

“…Additional confounders in biodiversitymental health studies are perceived naturalness, visual complexity and amount of nature in general (de Vries and Snep, 2019). Moreover, specific study contexts may require consideration of other confounders such as area socioeconomic status, degree of urbanization, area deprivation or neighbourhood gentrification stage (Cole et al, 2019), livestock rearing (Hasyim et al, 2018), weather, or study design factors like sampling order in experimental study designs (Triguero-Mas, Gidlow, et al, 2017). Statistical methods such as Bayesian network modelling can be a reasonable way to select a minimum sufficient set of confounders.…”

Eliminating Dengue Fever should be Easy Compared to Malaria – In a Malaysian Perspective

“…This can be prevented by confining such live-stock to barn-feeding mostly, with IRS of the barn, optionally netting-off the live-stock in such a barn. The live-stock could be let out mostly during the dry-season after residually spraying the live-stock [11]. In Sabah and Sarawak, the district-level entomologist is monitored by a team of entomologist at the state-level, who provide technical-expertise and supervision.…”