2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-020-04858-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Language Matter? Identity-First Versus Person-First Language Use in Autism Research: A Response to Vivanti

Abstract: In response to Vivanti’s ‘Ask The Editor…’ paper [Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50(2), 691–693], we argue that the use of language in autism research has material consequences for autistic people including stigmatisation, dehumanisation, and violence. Further, that the debate in the use of person-first language versus identity-first language should centre first and foremost on the needs, autonomy, and rights of autistic people, so in to preserve their rights to self-determination. Lastly, we p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
150
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 235 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
4
150
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We discussed our dislike of using words like 'patient' or 'participant' to describe people who should be people first and research volunteers second. The language used in academic literature is often medicalised, particularly in regards to autism and personality disorders, and focuses on participants as 'other' (Botha, Hanlon & Williams 2021;Bottema-Beutal et al 2021). The use of ableist language in research can be particularly dehumanising for marginalised researchers, standing as a constant reminder of our difference.…”
Section: Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We discussed our dislike of using words like 'patient' or 'participant' to describe people who should be people first and research volunteers second. The language used in academic literature is often medicalised, particularly in regards to autism and personality disorders, and focuses on participants as 'other' (Botha, Hanlon & Williams 2021;Bottema-Beutal et al 2021). The use of ableist language in research can be particularly dehumanising for marginalised researchers, standing as a constant reminder of our difference.…”
Section: Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, autistic individuals tend to focus on specific areas of interest much more than allistic individuals, who generally connect to broader, less focussed input from their environment (Lawson, 2011 : Mottron et al, 2006 ). When individuals diverge from the typical, according to traditional thinking, deficit language is often used, which can lead to increased ableism (see Botha et al, 2021 ; Bottema-Beutel et al, 2021 ). Over the past six decades, autism has been considered a “disadvantage” and a “disorder.” For example, it is common to read statistics such as “autism is a lifelong condition with estimated annual support costs to Australia potentially exceeding $7 billion” (Synergies Economic Consulting, 2011 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I will return to this point below, however, because the concerns exhibit a significant degree of variation when framed in international and multilinguistic contexts. It should also be noted that the rather basic sketch provided here, which reflects the standard terms of the discussion, scarcely represents the true complexity of the linguistic issues, explored in a sophisticated way by Botha et al (2021).…”
Section: The Involvement Of the Actually Autistic In Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research literature has typically preferred-or even required-the use of person-first language (e.g., "persons with autism") rather than identity-first language ("autistic persons"). Yet, in English speaking circles, at least in the U.K. and increasingly North America, most "actually autistic" 1 people prefer the latter (Kenny et al, 2016;Botha et al, 2021) and are often troubled by person-first language and the insistence on its use. To speak of "persons with autism" is to suggest that the autism is additional to their identity and somewhat detachable from it, rather than an essential element of who they are.…”
Section: The Involvement Of the Actually Autistic In Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%