2016
DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2016.1166210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Land Fragmentation Increase the Cost of Cultivation? Evidence from India

Abstract: Although a large literature discusses the productivity effects of land fragmentation, measurement and potential endogeneity issues are often overlooked. This paper uses several measures of fragmentation and controls for endogeneity and crop choice by looking at inherited paddy and wheat plots to show that these issues matter empirically. While crop choice can mitigate effects, fragmentation as measured by the Simpson index increases production cost and fosters substitution of labor for machinery, especially fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(12 reference statements)
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this does not take into account the different size of parcels in hectares, which we denote α k . One measure which incorporates both parcel count and size is the Simpson land fragmentation index (FI), used by both Ali, Deininger, and Ronchi () and Deininger et al (): italicFI=1kKαk2()kKαk2, where K is the number of parcels, and α k their size in square meters. A score of 0 would indicate no land fragmentation, while as K → ∞ FI → 1.…”
Section: Land Fragmentation and Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this does not take into account the different size of parcels in hectares, which we denote α k . One measure which incorporates both parcel count and size is the Simpson land fragmentation index (FI), used by both Ali, Deininger, and Ronchi () and Deininger et al (): italicFI=1kKαk2()kKαk2, where K is the number of parcels, and α k their size in square meters. A score of 0 would indicate no land fragmentation, while as K → ∞ FI → 1.…”
Section: Land Fragmentation and Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies find that land fragmentation is associated with lower agricultural output and reduced productivity in settings as diverse as rural China (Nguyen, Cheng, and Findlay ; Wan and Cheng ; Tan et al ), India (Jha, Nagarajan, and Prasanna ; Rahman and Rahman ; Deininger et al ), Vietnam (Van Hung, MacAulay, and Marsh ) and Rwanda (Ali, Deininger, and Ronchi ), but others find no significant effect on yields (Tan et al ). Land fragmentation tends to be associated with higher production costs, particularly in terms of labor, because of the lost time spent getting to spatially separated parcels (Van Hung, MacAulay, and Marsh ; Tan et al ; Ali, Deininger, and Ronchi ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not surprisingly, having own tractors significantly discourage renting-in of equipment (which are also mostly tractors). Lastly, adoption is higher if owned farmland plots are more fragmented, possibly because more fragmentation may mean a higher chance that farmers have at least some plots that are more easily accessible by tractors (this contrasts with Asia where all plots are relatively accessible (eg., Deininger et al 2017)). .000 .000 .000 Source: Authors' estimations.…”
Section: Results Based On Glssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because most SFHs have insufficient capital, marginal returns to labor in farming may decline quickly below non-farm wages, at which point, non-farm activities bring in higher returns to additional labor used. Also, because farm plots in Asia including Vietnam tend to be not only fragmented but also scattered spatially, marginal returns to aggregating land may be limited at higher margins for many households (e.g., Deininger et al 2017). At the same time, these SFHs continue some farming because marginal returns to factors (land, labor, etc.)…”
Section: Market Participation and Economies Of Scopementioning
confidence: 99%