2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-010-1805-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does it pay to delay? Flesh flies show adaptive plasticity in reproductive timing

Abstract: Life-history plasticity is widespread among organisms. However, an important question is whether this plasticity is adaptive, enhancing the organism’s fitness. Most models for plasticity in life-history timing predict that once they have reached the minimal nutritional threshold animals under poor conditions will accelerate timing to development or reproduction. Adaptive delays in reproductive timing are not common, especially in short-lived species. Examples of adaptive reproductive delays exist in mammalian … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Flies that received additional resources during the reproductive delay provisioned oocytes faster and had more eggs, results consistent with an adaptive delay to find more resources (Wessels et al, 2011). However, the experimental design in Wessels et al (2011) did not test the alternative hypothesis that the reproductive delay might also be produced by a physiological constraint, for example if the flies take longer to reproduce because they require time to reallocate resources from other somatic pools towards reproduction. In this study, flies that were nutritionally stressed (up to 12 days post-eclosion without protein) did not reallocate somatic capital reserves to reproduction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Flies that received additional resources during the reproductive delay provisioned oocytes faster and had more eggs, results consistent with an adaptive delay to find more resources (Wessels et al, 2011). However, the experimental design in Wessels et al (2011) did not test the alternative hypothesis that the reproductive delay might also be produced by a physiological constraint, for example if the flies take longer to reproduce because they require time to reallocate resources from other somatic pools towards reproduction. In this study, flies that were nutritionally stressed (up to 12 days post-eclosion without protein) did not reallocate somatic capital reserves to reproduction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Wessels et al (2011) evaluated if this reproductive delay in poorly fed females might be adaptive in the context of the scavenging lifestyle of flesh flies, to provide more time to find additional protein sources. Flies that received additional resources during the reproductive delay provisioned oocytes faster and had more eggs, results consistent with an adaptive delay to find more resources (Wessels et al, 2011). However, the experimental design in Wessels et al (2011) did not test the alternative hypothesis that the reproductive delay might also be produced by a physiological constraint, for example if the flies take longer to reproduce because they require time to reallocate resources from other somatic pools towards reproduction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although there is no direct evidence that lipid storage per se affects diapause status, many animals make life-history decisions based on internal condition (e.g. Wilbur & Collins 1973;Wessels et al 2011). Lipid stores constitute a large portion of energy reserves in R. pomonella (all treatment combinations in all experiments averaged above 30% lipid), and energy reserves that are continuously depleted during diapause are critical for survival overwinter and successful adult eclosion (Hahn & Denlinger 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, females—even in short‐lived species—vary in their timing of reproduction. While environmental circumstances, such as poor nutritional conditions, may arise in which it is advantageous for females to postpone reproduction (Bertness, ; Moehrlin & Juliano, ; Wessels, Kristal, Netter, Hatle, & Hahn, ), other factors, such as the availability of preferred or high‐quality mates, may also play a role in a female's decision to postpone mating. Given the trade‐off between reproduction and longevity, it is unclear whether postponing reproduction in hopes of locating a better mate is an advantageous strategy since the fitness benefits from mating with a high‐quality male may or may not outweigh the fitness costs associated with initiating offspring production later in life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%