1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0981(97)00138-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does invasion of oligohaline tidal marshes by reed grass, Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud., affect the availability of prey resources for the mummichog, Fundulus heteroclitus L.?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
56
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, there is evidence supporting the view that P. australis does not have a deleterious effect on the ability of marshes to function as habitat for fauna and especially nekton. Fell et al (1998) and Warren et al (2001) reported that fish foraging and the abundance of invertebrates were not affected by the expansion of P. australis. Other authors have found that fish species composition was also not affected by common reed invasion (Meyer et al, 2001) or that nekton densities are similar to those in some non-P. australis dominated wetlands (Hanson et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, there is evidence supporting the view that P. australis does not have a deleterious effect on the ability of marshes to function as habitat for fauna and especially nekton. Fell et al (1998) and Warren et al (2001) reported that fish foraging and the abundance of invertebrates were not affected by the expansion of P. australis. Other authors have found that fish species composition was also not affected by common reed invasion (Meyer et al, 2001) or that nekton densities are similar to those in some non-P. australis dominated wetlands (Hanson et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantify the response of saltmarsh epifauna to fish reduction and nutrient addition, passive collectors (litterbags; after Fell et al 1998) were deployed in the creek-bank Spartina alterniflora habitat for 2 wk in all treatment creeks in 2005 and 2006. Each litterbag (29 × 13.5 cm, 5 mm Delta weave mesh) was filled with 15 to 20 g of dried S. alterniflora leaves and stems.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the effects of these factors on epifauna (surfacedwelling invertebrates such as amphipods) remains relatively unknown, possibly because, due to their mobility, large-scale manipulations are required to effectively capture epifauna responses. Top-down control of epifauna such as amphipods may be exerted by the killifish Fundulus heteroclitus L. (Kneib 1982, Allen et al 1994, Fell et al 1998), a common predator in the tidal marshes of the western Atlantic (Allen et al 1994). Topdown control may also be exerted on epifauna by aerial predators (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fewer than 10 insect species are known to feed on P. australis in North America but the density of insects in P. australis stands can be high, with sensitivity varying by macroinvertebrate taxon (Chambers et al, 1999). Snails, amphipods, and isopods are common to abundant in P. australis habitat, exhibiting comparable abundances with resident marsh vegetation (Fell et al, 1998). This could be because P. australis provides better habitat for grazing invertebrates than cattail habitat: P. australis patches have exhibited high diatom density, and related high densities of snails (Holomuzki and Klarer, 2010).…”
Section: Effects On Avian Food Sources 192-a Invertebratesmentioning
confidence: 99%