2006
DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does intensive phototherapy produce hemolysis in newborns of 35 or more weeks gestation?

Abstract: Objective: Because there is some in vivo and in vitro evidence that standard phototherapy might produce hemolysis, we wished to know whether intensive phototherapy produces hemolysis. Study design:We measured end-tidal carbon monoxide (CO) concentration corrected for ambient CO (ETCOc) in 27 newborn infants X35 weeks gestation receiving intensive phototherapy (average irradiance 43 mW/cm 2 /nm).Results: There was a steady decrease in the mean ETCOc over the course of the phototherapy. Conclusion:Intensive phot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other in vitro studies have demonstrated cellular consequences of phototherapy, specifi cally, the ability to modify cellular DNA with the potential of mutagenic or carcinogenic changes [30][31][32] . In contrast, in vivo studies of healthy, term neonates exposed to phototherapy administered under clinical conditions, have not demonstrated evidence of hemolysis or lipid peroxidation [27,[33][34][35][36][37] . Apparent discrepancies between these in vitro and in vivo studies may be attributable, in part, to the unreliability of hematological indices as indicators of hemolysis in newborns, because of overlap in parameters between hemolytic and non-hemo- [38] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other in vitro studies have demonstrated cellular consequences of phototherapy, specifi cally, the ability to modify cellular DNA with the potential of mutagenic or carcinogenic changes [30][31][32] . In contrast, in vivo studies of healthy, term neonates exposed to phototherapy administered under clinical conditions, have not demonstrated evidence of hemolysis or lipid peroxidation [27,[33][34][35][36][37] . Apparent discrepancies between these in vitro and in vivo studies may be attributable, in part, to the unreliability of hematological indices as indicators of hemolysis in newborns, because of overlap in parameters between hemolytic and non-hemo- [38] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, rash extrapolations from in vitro studies to real life have previously muddied the waters of bilirubin metabolism and led, for example, to suggestions that photodegradation of bilirubin is the most important pathway in phototherapy and that photohemolysis might be a significant adverse effect of the treatment, suggestions now thought to be incorrect. 44,45 It seems to have gone unnoticed that bilirubin has the characteristics of a promiscuous inhibitor. [46][47][48] Promiscuous inhibitors are compounds that lead to false-positive results in the high-throughput screening of potential drugs in vitro.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%