2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does injustice affect your sense of taste and smell? The mediating role of moral disgust

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To test whether moral emotions could account for the effect, participants reported to what extent they experienced moral anger (angry, upset, and hostile; α = .92; averaged to form an index of moral anger), disgust, positive (averaged 10-items; α = .91) and negative affect (averaged 10-items; α = 93) captured by the PANAS scale, along 1 (not at all) to 9 (extremely) after they responded to the conformist attitude and need to belong scales. Replicating previous findings (Chan et al 2014;Skarlicki et al 2013), participants in the moral violation condition also experienced greater moral anger (F(2, 268) = 13.09, p < .001) and disgust (F(2, 268) = 21.95, p < .001; see Table S1 for means and SDs) than those in the two control conditions. In addition, although participants in the three conditions did not differ in positive affect (p > .73), those in the moral violation condition reported feeling more negative affect (F(2, 268) = 6.46, p = .002).…”
Section: Moderated Mediation With Contrast Codingsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To test whether moral emotions could account for the effect, participants reported to what extent they experienced moral anger (angry, upset, and hostile; α = .92; averaged to form an index of moral anger), disgust, positive (averaged 10-items; α = .91) and negative affect (averaged 10-items; α = 93) captured by the PANAS scale, along 1 (not at all) to 9 (extremely) after they responded to the conformist attitude and need to belong scales. Replicating previous findings (Chan et al 2014;Skarlicki et al 2013), participants in the moral violation condition also experienced greater moral anger (F(2, 268) = 13.09, p < .001) and disgust (F(2, 268) = 21.95, p < .001; see Table S1 for means and SDs) than those in the two control conditions. In addition, although participants in the three conditions did not differ in positive affect (p > .73), those in the moral violation condition reported feeling more negative affect (F(2, 268) = 6.46, p = .002).…”
Section: Moderated Mediation With Contrast Codingsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…We offer a new mechanism through which exposure to moral violations can influence consumer choice. Whereas extant research has primarily focused on how witnessing moral violations leads to moral disgust (Chapman et al 2009), which intensifies disgust reactions toward gustatory and olfactory stimuli (Skarlicki et al 2013) and reduces consumers' consumption of food and drinks (Chan et al 2014), we instead bring to light the influence of witnessing moral violations on consumers' preference for consumption choice options that are endorsed by the majority (vs. minority). Our research suggests that when actions aimed at directly condemning and punishing moral violations are not immediately available, consumers have a tendency to conform to the majority.…”
Section: Theoretical Contributions Of the Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, appraisals of a person's untrustworthiness have been found to trigger disgust (Hutcherson & Gross, ). Other research has found that interpersonal injustices (i.e., treating people with a lack of dignity and respect) resulted in disgust (Skarlicki, Hoegg, Aquino, & Nadisic, ).…”
Section: Moral Emotions In the Management Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This basic emotion, which seems to have benefited our ancestors by helping them avoid unhealthy experiences, might have been co-opted by evolution to serve a moral purpose (Haidt 2003(Haidt , 2006. In fact, it is common for people to respond to certain moral violations, especially those involving a perception of impure contamination, with a sense of disgust (e.g., Schnall et al 2008Schnall et al , 2009Skarlicki et al 2013). Given such indication, one would expect involvement of the insulae when people make moral assessments on unfair events.…”
Section: Additional Brain Regions Involved and Justice Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%