2002
DOI: 10.1006/appe.2002.0492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does information about MSG (monosodium glutamate) content influence consumer ratings of soups with and without added MSG?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
24
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, in the experiment, information about flavor has the greatest effect on the choice of a ham sandwich with sodium nitrite. This evidence supports the result of Prescott and Young (2002), that the effect of sensory properties is stronger than other information if tasting is conducted. In addition, in the survey, the result that health risk information plays the most important role in influencing ham sandwich selection also supports the evidence found in several previous studies (e.g., Shogren et al, 1994;Fox et al, 2002;Hayes et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Third, in the experiment, information about flavor has the greatest effect on the choice of a ham sandwich with sodium nitrite. This evidence supports the result of Prescott and Young (2002), that the effect of sensory properties is stronger than other information if tasting is conducted. In addition, in the survey, the result that health risk information plays the most important role in influencing ham sandwich selection also supports the evidence found in several previous studies (e.g., Shogren et al, 1994;Fox et al, 2002;Hayes et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Schiffman (1998) found that 0.3Á1.0% MSG improved acceptability in a number of foods among malnourished elderly people, and Prescott and Young (2002) improved liking of vegetable soup using 0.8% MSG among participants aged 20Á68 years. On the other hand, there are studies that find similar results to ours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Information, which can range from a concise product label to a full, detailed description of a product, may induce positive or negative expectations for a food product, leading to a change in food acceptance (Jaeger & MacFie, 2001;Prescott & Young, 2002). Studies have found that the impact of information varies depending on the content of the information (Jaeger & MacFie, 2001), the novelty (Cardello, Maller, Masor, Dubose, & Edelman, 1985) or cultural context of the product (Zellner, Stewart, Rozin, & Brown, 1988), and consumer attitudes (Kähkönen, Tuorila, & Rita, 1996).…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 98%