Does Informatics Enable or Inhibit the Delivery of Patient-centred, Coordinated, and Quality-assured Care: a Delphi Study

Abstract

SummaryBackground: Primary care delivers patient-centred and coordinated care, which should be quality-assured. Much of family practice now routinely uses computerised medical record (CMR) systems, these systems being linked at varying levels to laboratories and other care providers. CMR systems have the potential to support care. Objective: To achieve a consensus among an international panel of health care professionals and informatics experts about the role of informatics in the delivery of patient-centred, coordinated, and quality-assured care. Method: The consensus building exercise involved 20 individuals, five general practitioners and 15 informatics academics, members of the International Medical Informatics Association Primary Care Informatics Working Group. A thematic analysis of the literature was carried out according to the defined themes. Results:The first round of the analysis developed 27 statements on how the CMR, or any other information system, including paper-based medical records, supports care delivery. Round 2 aimed at achieving a consensus about the statements of round one. Round 3 stated that there was an agreement on informatics principles and structures that should be put in place. However, there was a disagreement about the processes involved in the implementation, and about the clinical interaction with the systems after the implementation. Conclusions: The panel had a strong agreement about the core concepts and structures that should be put in place to support high quality care. However, this agreement evaporated over statements related to implementation. These findings reflect literature and personal experiences: whilst there is consensus about how informatics structures and processes support good quality care, implementation is difficult.

The public health care system and primary care services in Saudi Arabia: a system in transition

“…High-quality computing services including electronic health records and clinical decision-making support tools are essential to quality healthcare service (63). Such initiatives can assist in delivering effective patient-centred care (64). Therefore, implementing eHealth to the current PHC facilities is crucial to serve patients' needs and to enhance the knowledge base of physicians and other health care professionals.…”

In this issue: Realising benefits and that informatics is all about the patient

“…However, implementation remains our biggest challenge in informatics and is the area where we have the weakest consensus about the right way forward 21. Usability is a sine qua non for a successful implementation.…”

Clinical Information Systems – From Yesterday to Tomorrow

“…Liyanage and the IMIA Primary Health Care Informatics Working Group were concerned about whether informatics enabled or inhibited higher quality of patient care [124]. Their work at building a consensus from a careful literature review, interviews of clinicians, and clinical informaticians was successful on the conceptual ideas, but evaporated when it came to implementation.…”