2022
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11185297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Influenza Vaccination Reduce the Risk of Contracting COVID-19?

Abstract: The concurrent timing of the COVID-19 pandemic and the seasonal occurrence of influenza, makes it especially important to analyze the possible effect of the influenza vaccine on the risk of contracting COVID-19, or in reducing the complications caused by both diseases, especially in vulnerable populations. There is very little scientific information on the possible protective role of the influenza vaccine against the risk of contracting COVID-19, particularly in groups at high-risk of influenza complications. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since influenza almost disappeared during the 2020 season 17–23 and thus the prevention of co‐infection could not explain this possible protective effect of the influenza vaccination on COVID‐19, it was hypothesized that influenza vaccination directly played protective roles against SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. The ensuing studies on the association between influenza vaccination and SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and COVID‐19 severity were the basis for this meta‐analysis 38–88 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since influenza almost disappeared during the 2020 season 17–23 and thus the prevention of co‐infection could not explain this possible protective effect of the influenza vaccination on COVID‐19, it was hypothesized that influenza vaccination directly played protective roles against SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. The ensuing studies on the association between influenza vaccination and SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and COVID‐19 severity were the basis for this meta‐analysis 38–88 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for exclusion of other trials was specified (lack of details, no controls, Figure 1). In total: 51 studies, 33 studies for infection (with 37 comparison arms), 38–70 14 studies (with 14 comparison arms) for hospitalization, 43,46,53,54,57,69,71–78 11 studies (with 11 comparison arms) for admission to ICU, 42,53,54,73,77–79 and 19 studies (with 20 comparison arms) for mortality 43,53,57,61,69,75–78,80–88 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Tables 1A,B,C,D show details of studies included in this meta‐analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%